TY - JOUR
T1 - The impact of the workshop activity for gender equity simulation in the Academy (WAGES-Academic) in demonstrating cumulative effects of gender bias
AU - Shields, Stephanie A.
AU - Zawadzki, Matthew J.
AU - Johnson, R. Neill
PY - 2011/6
Y1 - 2011/6
N2 - We report experimental evaluation of the Workshop Activity for Gender Equity Simulation in the Academy (WAGES-Academic), a brief, experiential simulation of the cumulative effects of unconscious bias in the academic workplace. We predicted that participants who played WAGES-Academic would demonstrate significantly increased knowledge and retention of gender equity issues in the academic workplace compared with participants in a control condition. Baseline information on general knowledge of workplace gender equity issues was obtained from 1,254 undergraduates. In the second phase, 144 were randomly assigned to complete either WAGES-Academic or a control task, and the immediate effects of the activities were measured. Participants were contacted 7-11 days later to complete an online measure of knowledge retention. Compared with a control condition, WAGES-Academic increased knowledge and retention. This effect occurred irrespective of prior level of sexist beliefs, participant gender, or whether the participant had been on the advantaged or disadvantaged team. Potential use and testing of WAGES-Academic with university faculty and administrators are discussed.
AB - We report experimental evaluation of the Workshop Activity for Gender Equity Simulation in the Academy (WAGES-Academic), a brief, experiential simulation of the cumulative effects of unconscious bias in the academic workplace. We predicted that participants who played WAGES-Academic would demonstrate significantly increased knowledge and retention of gender equity issues in the academic workplace compared with participants in a control condition. Baseline information on general knowledge of workplace gender equity issues was obtained from 1,254 undergraduates. In the second phase, 144 were randomly assigned to complete either WAGES-Academic or a control task, and the immediate effects of the activities were measured. Participants were contacted 7-11 days later to complete an online measure of knowledge retention. Compared with a control condition, WAGES-Academic increased knowledge and retention. This effect occurred irrespective of prior level of sexist beliefs, participant gender, or whether the participant had been on the advantaged or disadvantaged team. Potential use and testing of WAGES-Academic with university faculty and administrators are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958796546&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958796546&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/a0022953
DO - 10.1037/a0022953
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:79958796546
SN - 1938-8926
VL - 4
SP - 120
EP - 129
JO - Journal of Diversity in Higher Education
JF - Journal of Diversity in Higher Education
IS - 2
ER -