Abstract
For nearly a century, criminologists have been well acquainted with the group nature of crime. In the early part of the twentieth century, Shaw and McKay (1942) observed that the vast majority (approximately 80%) of juveniles who were seen in the Cook County Juvenile Court were suspected of committing crimes with accomplices; similar findings have consistently emerged in the decades since with regard to both official records and self-reports, as well as across a wide range of locations (e.g., Carrington, 2002; Sarnecki, 2001; Warr, 2002; cf. Stolzenberg & D’Allesio, 2008). Indeed, Breckinridge and Abbott’s (1912) observation that a delinquent who offends alone is a rarity can, at this point, rightly be called a criminological “fact” (McGloin, Sullivan, Piquero, & Bacon, 2008).
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Crime and Networks |
| Publisher | Taylor and Francis |
| Pages | 13-27 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781134643325 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780415644532 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2013 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Social Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The importance of studying co-offending networks for criminological theory and policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver