TY - JOUR
T1 - The Incidence of Imprecise ICD-10 Coding in Patients with Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma
T2 - A MarketScan Database Study
AU - Svoboda, Ryan
AU - Sun, Haorui
AU - Maczuga, Steven
AU - Helm, Matthew
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 THE AUTHORS.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: The term “Primary Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma” (primary CTCL), although used largely interchangeably with mycosis fungoides in the past, actually represents numerous non-Hodgkin lymphomas with highly variable and distinct characteristics. Accuracy of claims-based research studies of CTCL hinge on the precision of ICD-10 coding, but the incidence of imprecise coding for CTCL has not been extensively studied. Objective: To determine the incidence of imprecise ICD-10 coding in CTCL patients in a large, commercial claims database. Methods: We analyzed the Marketscan database from October 1, 2015 to December 31, 2018 to determine the proportion of patients designated only with the generic CTCL code in the absence of a code for a more specific diagnosis. Results: Of 3,953 patients meeting the criteria for inclusion, only 107 (2.7%) had a generic CTCL code without a more specific diagnosis code. Conclusions: These results suggest that the majority of CTCL claims are precisely coded, although until future studies investigate the accuracy of diagnosis, the results of claims-based studies in the realm of CTCL should be interpreted with caution.
AB - Background: The term “Primary Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma” (primary CTCL), although used largely interchangeably with mycosis fungoides in the past, actually represents numerous non-Hodgkin lymphomas with highly variable and distinct characteristics. Accuracy of claims-based research studies of CTCL hinge on the precision of ICD-10 coding, but the incidence of imprecise coding for CTCL has not been extensively studied. Objective: To determine the incidence of imprecise ICD-10 coding in CTCL patients in a large, commercial claims database. Methods: We analyzed the Marketscan database from October 1, 2015 to December 31, 2018 to determine the proportion of patients designated only with the generic CTCL code in the absence of a code for a more specific diagnosis. Results: Of 3,953 patients meeting the criteria for inclusion, only 107 (2.7%) had a generic CTCL code without a more specific diagnosis code. Conclusions: These results suggest that the majority of CTCL claims are precisely coded, although until future studies investigate the accuracy of diagnosis, the results of claims-based studies in the realm of CTCL should be interpreted with caution.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146285053&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85146285053&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.25251/skin.7.1.5
DO - 10.25251/skin.7.1.5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85146285053
SN - 2574-1624
VL - 7
SP - 589
EP - 593
JO - SKIN: Journal of Cutaneous Medicine
JF - SKIN: Journal of Cutaneous Medicine
IS - 1
ER -