TY - JOUR
T1 - The Influence of Fact-Checking Is Disputed! The Role of Party Identification in Processing and Sharing Fact-Checked Social Media Posts
AU - Oeldorf-Hirsch, Anne
AU - Schmierbach, Mike
AU - Appelman, Alyssa
AU - Boyle, Michael P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 SAGE Publications.
PY - 2024/9
Y1 - 2024/9
N2 - Social media play an important role in political communication, leading to growing concerns about the credibility of shared information. Attempts to slow the spread of misinformation by platforms such as Facebook and Twitter include adding fact-checking labels to social media posts, the effectiveness of which remains unclear. Using two experiments, we tested the credibility effects of fact-checking labels (confirmed vs. disputed) on graphical presentations of political (Democrat vs. Republican) quotes and social media news posts. Study 1 (N = 312) tested the effects of these labels on political social media posts with political quotes, and Study 2 (N = 356) replicated and extended this research to a news story post about a politician. Results indicate that the valence of verification labels on their own do not affect perceptions of the content. Instead, users find corrections of opposite-party political figures more credible and are more willing to share content when it negatively portrays opposite-party political figures. These results demonstrate potential limitations of fact-checking labels and highlight the importance of considering political ideology in correcting misinformation on social media sites.
AB - Social media play an important role in political communication, leading to growing concerns about the credibility of shared information. Attempts to slow the spread of misinformation by platforms such as Facebook and Twitter include adding fact-checking labels to social media posts, the effectiveness of which remains unclear. Using two experiments, we tested the credibility effects of fact-checking labels (confirmed vs. disputed) on graphical presentations of political (Democrat vs. Republican) quotes and social media news posts. Study 1 (N = 312) tested the effects of these labels on political social media posts with political quotes, and Study 2 (N = 356) replicated and extended this research to a news story post about a politician. Results indicate that the valence of verification labels on their own do not affect perceptions of the content. Instead, users find corrections of opposite-party political figures more credible and are more willing to share content when it negatively portrays opposite-party political figures. These results demonstrate potential limitations of fact-checking labels and highlight the importance of considering political ideology in correcting misinformation on social media sites.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85161714211&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85161714211&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/00027642231174335
DO - 10.1177/00027642231174335
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85161714211
SN - 0002-7642
VL - 68
SP - 1345
EP - 1365
JO - American Behavioral Scientist
JF - American Behavioral Scientist
IS - 10
ER -