The influence of spatial and temporal scale on the relative importance of biotic vs. abiotic factors for species distributions

Keyphrases

• Species Distribution 100%
• Abiotic Factors 100%
• Carnivores 100%
• Distribution Pattern 75%
• Carnivore Species 75%
• Occupancy 50%
• Competitive Interactions 50%
• Biotic Factors 50%
• Biotic Interactions 50%
• Occupancy Models 50%
• Grain Size 25%
• Multiple Temporal Scales 25%
• Multiple Spatial Scales 25%
• Mutualistic Interactions 25%
• Relative Influence 25%
• Explanatory Power 25%
• Model Distribution 25%
• Single Species 25%
• Accurately Model 25%
• Washington State 25%
• Fine Temporal Scale 25%
• Interaction Games 25%
• Species Occupancy 25%
• Fine Resolution 25%
• Abiotic Variables 25%
• Large-scale Disturbance 25%
• Camera Trap 25%
• Predator-prey Interactions 25%
• Occupancy Patterns 25%
• Interaction Influence 25%
• Mammalian Carnivores 25%
• Multiscale Data 25%

Earth and Planetary Sciences

• Abiotic Factor 100%
• United States of America 50%
• Washington 50%
• Interspecific Interaction 50%
• Grain Size 50%
• Biotic Factor 50%
• Regional Geography 50%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences

• Grains 100%
• Temporal Scale 100%
• Camera Trapping 25%
• Biotic Factor 25%