TY - JOUR
T1 - The influence of species life history and distribution characteristics on species responses to habitat fragmentation in an urban landscape
AU - Amburgey, Staci M.
AU - Miller, David A.W.
AU - Rochester, Carlton J.
AU - Delaney, Katy S.
AU - Riley, Seth P.D.
AU - Brehme, Cheryl S.
AU - Hathaway, Stacie A.
AU - Fisher, Robert N.
N1 - Funding Information:
We are thankful to the numerous researchers from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and U.S. National Park Service (NPS) who collected these data, particularly Adam Backlin, Gary Busteed, Denise Clark, J.P. Montagne, Drew Stokes and Samantha Weber. This work was conducted as part of the Amphibian Decline Working Group supported by the John Wesley Powell Center for Analysis and Synthesis, funded by the USGS. Additional funding was provided by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Pennsylvania Space Grant Graduate Fellowship. Funding for pitfall installation and surveying was provided by the Bureau of Land Management, California State Parks, Canon Inc., California Department of Fish and Wildlife, the City and County of San Diego, Los Angeles Audubon Society, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, Metropolitan Water District, NPS and National Park Foundation, Nature Reserve of Orange County, San Diego Zoo, San Diego Association of Governments, San Diego State University, Seaver Institute, The Nature Conservancy, University of California, Irvine and San Diego, U.S. Forest Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, USGS and Wildlife Corridor Conservation Authority. This manuscript is contribution #768 of the USGS Amphibian Research and Monitoring Initiative. Any use of trade, firm or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Funding Information:
We are thankful to the numerous researchers from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and U.S. National Park Service (NPS) who collected these data, particularly Adam Backlin, Gary Busteed, Denise Clark, J.P. Montagne, Drew Stokes and Samantha Weber. This work was conducted as part of the Amphibian Decline Working Group supported by the John Wesley Powell Center for Analysis and Synthesis, funded by the USGS. Additional funding was provided by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Pennsylvania Space Grant Graduate Fellowship. Funding for pitfall installation and surveying was provided by the Bureau of Land Management, California State Parks, Canon Inc., California Department of Fish and Wildlife, the City and County of San Diego, Los Angeles Audubon Society, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, Metropolitan Water District, NPS and National Park Foundation, Nature Reserve of Orange County, San Diego Zoo, San Diego Association of Governments, San Diego State University, Seaver Institute, The Nature Conservancy, University of California, Irvine and San Diego, U.S. Forest Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, USGS and Wildlife Corridor Conservation Authority. This manuscript is contribution #768 of the USGS Amphibian Research and Monitoring Initiative. Any use of trade, firm or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 British Ecological Society
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - Fragmentation within urbanized environments often leads to a loss of native species diversity; however, variation exists in responses among-species and among-populations within species. We aimed to identify patterns in species biogeography in an urbanized landscape to understand anthropogenic effects on vertebrate communities and identify species that are more sensitive or resilient to landscape change. We investigated patterns in species richness and species responses to fragmentation in southern Californian small vertebrate communities using multispecies occupancy models and determined factors associated with overall commonness and sensitivity to patch size for 45 small vertebrate species both among and within remaining non-developed patches. In general, smaller patches had fewer species, with amphibian species richness being particularly sensitive to patch size effects. Mammals were generally more common, occurring both in a greater proportion of patches and a higher proportion of the sites within occupied patches. Alternatively, amphibians were generally restricted to larger patches but were more ubiquitous within smaller patches when occupied. Species range size was positively correlated with how common a species was across and within patches, even when controlling for only patches that fell within a species' range. We found sensitivity to patch size was greater for more fecund species and depended on where the patch occurred within a species' range. While all taxa were more likely to occur in patches in the warmer portions of their ranges, amphibians and mammals were more sensitive to fragmentation in these warmer areas as compared to the rest of their ranges. Similarly, amphibians occurred at a smaller proportion of sites within patches in drier portions of their ranges. Mammals occurred at a higher proportion of sites that were also in drier portions of their range while reptiles did not differ in their sensitivity to patch size by range position. We demonstrate that taxonomy, life history, range size and range position can predict commonness and sensitivity of species across this highly fragmented yet biodiverse landscape. The impacts of fragmentation on species communities within an urban landscape depend on scale, with differences emerging among and within species and populations.
AB - Fragmentation within urbanized environments often leads to a loss of native species diversity; however, variation exists in responses among-species and among-populations within species. We aimed to identify patterns in species biogeography in an urbanized landscape to understand anthropogenic effects on vertebrate communities and identify species that are more sensitive or resilient to landscape change. We investigated patterns in species richness and species responses to fragmentation in southern Californian small vertebrate communities using multispecies occupancy models and determined factors associated with overall commonness and sensitivity to patch size for 45 small vertebrate species both among and within remaining non-developed patches. In general, smaller patches had fewer species, with amphibian species richness being particularly sensitive to patch size effects. Mammals were generally more common, occurring both in a greater proportion of patches and a higher proportion of the sites within occupied patches. Alternatively, amphibians were generally restricted to larger patches but were more ubiquitous within smaller patches when occupied. Species range size was positively correlated with how common a species was across and within patches, even when controlling for only patches that fell within a species' range. We found sensitivity to patch size was greater for more fecund species and depended on where the patch occurred within a species' range. While all taxa were more likely to occur in patches in the warmer portions of their ranges, amphibians and mammals were more sensitive to fragmentation in these warmer areas as compared to the rest of their ranges. Similarly, amphibians occurred at a smaller proportion of sites within patches in drier portions of their ranges. Mammals occurred at a higher proportion of sites that were also in drier portions of their range while reptiles did not differ in their sensitivity to patch size by range position. We demonstrate that taxonomy, life history, range size and range position can predict commonness and sensitivity of species across this highly fragmented yet biodiverse landscape. The impacts of fragmentation on species communities within an urban landscape depend on scale, with differences emerging among and within species and populations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100071571&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100071571&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1365-2656.13403
DO - 10.1111/1365-2656.13403
M3 - Article
C2 - 33300621
AN - SCOPUS:85100071571
SN - 0021-8790
VL - 90
SP - 685
EP - 697
JO - Journal of Animal Ecology
JF - Journal of Animal Ecology
IS - 3
ER -