Abstract
This paper provides a review and evaluation of different food-risk prioritization and management frameworks that have been developed by governmental food-safety authorities, regulatory agencies and non-governmental institutions worldwide. It emphasizes the need for a new science- and risk-based system approach to microbial risk prioritization. We find that most studies and projects argue for a systematic and multi-disciplinary approach to risk prioritization but nevertheless lack it. Human and public health issues have constituted the core focus of food-risk analysis in food-borne risk prioritization studies, where the majority of studies use the concept of disease burden. Even though it is widely recognized that economic and market-level impacts of microbial hazards and preventive interventions to reduce food-borne risks are crucial to the performance of industries and markets, they are almost never accounted for in risk prioritization frameworks.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 215-239 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Journal of Risk Research |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 2011 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
- General Social Sciences
- General Engineering
- Strategy and Management
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The international quest for an integrated approach to microbial food-borne risk prioritization: Where do we stand?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver