The long-term benefits of human generosity in indirect reciprocity

Claus Wedekind, Victoria A. Braithwaite

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

158 Scopus citations


Among the theories that have been proposed to explain the evolution of altruism [1-7] are direct reciprocity [8-11] and indirect reciprocity [12-21]. The idea of the latter is that helping someone or refusing to do so has an impact on one's reputation within a group. This reputation is constantly assessed and reassessed by others and is taken into account by them in future social interactions. Generosity in indirect reciprocity can evolve if and only if it eventually leads to a net benefit in the long term. Here, we show that this key assumption is met. We let 114 students play for money in an indirect and a subsequent direct reciprocity game. We found that although being generous, i.e., giving something of value to others, had the obvious short-term costs, it paid in the long run because it builds up a reputation that is rewarded by third parties (who thereby themselves increase their reputation). A reputation of being generous also provided an advantage in the subsequent direct reciprocity game, probably because it builds up trust that can lead to more stable cooperation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1012-1015
Number of pages4
JournalCurrent Biology
Issue number12
StatePublished - Jun 25 2002

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences


Dive into the research topics of 'The long-term benefits of human generosity in indirect reciprocity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this