Abstract
Should politicians, technocrats, or the free market guide the economic development of a developing country? The historical development paths of countries vary widely. Public opinion concerning development models also differs across space and over time. Using Chinese aid data from AidData and the second round Afrobarometer survey, we study how Chinese aid affects local preferences for economic leadership in sixteen African countries, 2000-2005. Our causal identification strategy is to compare the preferences of respondents who lived near an aid project site where a Chinese project had been implemented at the time of the interview (treated group) to individuals who lived close to a site where a Chinese project would be initiated shortly after the interview (control group). We find that Chinese aid increases the local population's support for economic experts to run the economy. World Bank aid, on the other hand, has no impact on local preferences for economic leadership.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Article number | orad010 |
| Journal | Foreign Policy Analysis |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 1 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Political Science and International Relations
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Lure of Technocracy? Chinese Aid and Local Preferences for Development Leadership in Africa'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver