The Militarized Interstate Dispute Dataset: Putting Things in Perspective

Glenn Palmer, Vito D'Orazio, Michael R. Kenwick, Roseanne W. McManus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations


In their latest research note in our ongoing dialogue about the Militarized Interstate Dispute (MID) dataset, Gibler, Miller, and Little (GML) reiterate their concerns about a high error rate in the MID dataset and challenge our prior replication studies, which showed that GML's recommended changes to the dataset caused few substantive changes in the core findings of two published studies. In this rejoinder, we offer further explanation of our decision-making, put GML's claims about the error rate in context, defend our replication methodology and results, and offer advice for MID dataset users.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)480-481
Number of pages2
JournalInternational Studies Quarterly
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 1 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations


Dive into the research topics of 'The Militarized Interstate Dispute Dataset: Putting Things in Perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this