TY - GEN
T1 - The modeling and analysis of a package-scale circulating fluidized combustor
AU - Kremer, Matthew J.
AU - Yavuzkurt, Savas
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - The preliminary analysis of a package-scale circulating fluidized bed (CFB) combustor through modeling and experimentation was performed to help determine particle trajectories and carbon burnout efficiency. The CFB consisted of a primary fast fluidizing bed and two bubbling beds. The fluidized bed models found in literature and a freeboard model utilizing a commercial code, FLUENT, were used in simulations. Primary gas velocity of the fast fluidizing bed was varied between 4.9 and 12.2 m/s and gas temperatures were varied between 800 and 1200 K. For comparison with computations of hydrodynamics, a scaled down version of the combustor was run using granulated plastic particles at 300 K. The results of computations showed that the freeboard has a very complex flow with many recirculation zones that usually become larger and move away from the walls with increasing primary velocity. There was less particle movement in the experiments than in the simulations due to the differences in particle diameters, the type of particles, the gas temperature, and the scaling geometry.
AB - The preliminary analysis of a package-scale circulating fluidized bed (CFB) combustor through modeling and experimentation was performed to help determine particle trajectories and carbon burnout efficiency. The CFB consisted of a primary fast fluidizing bed and two bubbling beds. The fluidized bed models found in literature and a freeboard model utilizing a commercial code, FLUENT, were used in simulations. Primary gas velocity of the fast fluidizing bed was varied between 4.9 and 12.2 m/s and gas temperatures were varied between 800 and 1200 K. For comparison with computations of hydrodynamics, a scaled down version of the combustor was run using granulated plastic particles at 300 K. The results of computations showed that the freeboard has a very complex flow with many recirculation zones that usually become larger and move away from the walls with increasing primary velocity. There was less particle movement in the experiments than in the simulations due to the differences in particle diameters, the type of particles, the gas temperature, and the scaling geometry.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905758041&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84905758041&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/2001-GT-0002
DO - 10.1115/2001-GT-0002
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84905758041
SN - 9780791878514
T3 - Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo
BT - Coal, Biomass and Alternative Fuels; Combustion and Fuels; Oil and Gas Applications; Cycle Innovations
PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
T2 - ASME Turbo Expo 2001: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, GT 2001
Y2 - 4 June 2001 through 7 June 2001
ER -