Abstract
This article seeks to recover the original 'Shakespeare Myth', which emerges in three waves. In the first, early critics used a biographical method to reconstruct the man, whose plays form the highest authority for value in a national imperial culture. In the second, theorists used 'cultural materialism' to debunk this myth. In the third, critics now are using a bibliographical method to challenge the revisionist model by transposing the conversation from 'the man of the theater' to 'the literary author'. This third wave receives support from contemporary reports (1592-1640). They present The Shakespeare Myth as a myth of authorial fame.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 19-29 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Cahiers Elisabethains |
| Volume | 90 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 2016 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- History
- Literature and Literary Theory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The myth behind 'The Shakespeare Myth': Contemporary reports, 1592-1640'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver