TY - JOUR
T1 - The poor predictive performance of asset pricing models
AU - Simin, Timothy
N1 - Funding Information:
∗Simin, [email protected], Department of Finance, Pennsylvania State University, 345 Business Building, University Park, PA 16802. I am grateful to Amit Goyal (the referee), Wayne Ferson, Ravi Jagannathan, Harold Mulherin, Gordon Hanka, Michael McCracken, and seminar participants at the Financial Management Association Doctoral Student Consortium, University of Washington, Pennsylvania State University, Syracuse University, Southern Methodist University, Arizona State University, Texas A&M, and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill for helpful comments. I also gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Northern Finance Association through their Best Investments Paper award. All errors are my own.
PY - 2008/6
Y1 - 2008/6
N2 - This paper examines time-series forecast errors of expected returns from conditional and unconditional asset pricing models for portfolio and individual firm equity returns. A new result that increases predictive precision concerning model specification and forecasting is introduced. Conditional versions of the models generally produce higher mean squared errors than unconditional versions for step ahead prediction. This holds for individual firm data when the instruments are firm specific. Mean square forecast error decompositions indicate that the asset pricing models produce relatively unbiased predictions, but the variance is severe enough to ruin the step ahead predictive ability beyond that of a constant benchmark.
AB - This paper examines time-series forecast errors of expected returns from conditional and unconditional asset pricing models for portfolio and individual firm equity returns. A new result that increases predictive precision concerning model specification and forecasting is introduced. Conditional versions of the models generally produce higher mean squared errors than unconditional versions for step ahead prediction. This holds for individual firm data when the instruments are firm specific. Mean square forecast error decompositions indicate that the asset pricing models produce relatively unbiased predictions, but the variance is severe enough to ruin the step ahead predictive ability beyond that of a constant benchmark.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=46849120008&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=46849120008&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/s0022109000003550
DO - 10.1017/s0022109000003550
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:46849120008
SN - 0022-1090
VL - 43
SP - 355
EP - 380
JO - Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
JF - Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
IS - 2
ER -