TY - JOUR
T1 - The power problems of unit root test in time series with autoregressive errors
AU - DeJong, David N.
AU - Nankervis, John C.
AU - Savin, N. E.
AU - Whiteman, Charles H.
N1 - Funding Information:
*We thank Dean Corbae. In Choi, Sam Ouliarus, Joon Park, two anonymous referees, an Associate Editor, and Arnold Zellner for helpful discussions and comments, and Robert Engle, Charles Nelson, and Robert Shiller for supplying us with their data. DeJong gratefully acknowledges support from the NSF under grant SES 90-05180; Whiteman gratefully acknowledges support from the NSF under grant SES 89-22419.
PY - 1992
Y1 - 1992
N2 - Monte Carlo methods are used to study the size and power of serial-correlation-corrected versions of the Dickey-Fuller (1979,1981) unit root tests appropriate when the time series has unknown mean. The modifications do not cause serious size distortions or power deterioration in the white noise case. While studies in the literature have investigated the operating characteristics of these tests in the presence of moving average errors, of particular concern in this paper is the performance of these procedures in the presence of autoregressive errors. The Philips and Perron (1988) and Choi and Philips (1991) procedures are found to suffer from serious size distortions and have very low power when errors are autoregressively correlated. We conclude that even in the most favorable cases, these tests perform poorly against trend-stationary alternatives which are plausible for annual, quarterly, and monthly macroeconomic time series. The augmented Dickey-Fuller procedure, on the other hand, is reasonably well-behaved.
AB - Monte Carlo methods are used to study the size and power of serial-correlation-corrected versions of the Dickey-Fuller (1979,1981) unit root tests appropriate when the time series has unknown mean. The modifications do not cause serious size distortions or power deterioration in the white noise case. While studies in the literature have investigated the operating characteristics of these tests in the presence of moving average errors, of particular concern in this paper is the performance of these procedures in the presence of autoregressive errors. The Philips and Perron (1988) and Choi and Philips (1991) procedures are found to suffer from serious size distortions and have very low power when errors are autoregressively correlated. We conclude that even in the most favorable cases, these tests perform poorly against trend-stationary alternatives which are plausible for annual, quarterly, and monthly macroeconomic time series. The augmented Dickey-Fuller procedure, on the other hand, is reasonably well-behaved.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001403098&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001403098&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0304-4076(92)90090-E
DO - 10.1016/0304-4076(92)90090-E
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0001403098
SN - 0304-4076
VL - 53
SP - 323
EP - 343
JO - Journal of Econometrics
JF - Journal of Econometrics
IS - 1-3
ER -