Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The quality of bioethics debate: Implications for clinical ethics committees

  • Laura Williamson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Bioethicists have recently expressed concern over a lack of quality control within the field. This apprehension focuses on bioethics expanding in ways that obscure its distinctive ethical remit and the specialist reasoning skills it requires. This thesis about the quality and conduct of bioethics may have particular relevance for clinical ethics. As one of the youngest offshoots of bioethics, the field focuses on the ethical issues that arise specifically in a clinical context. However, non-ethics specialists are increasingly involved in this field. This means that clinical ethics could be especially vulnerable to the quality control concerns articulated within bioethics. The growing public profile of clinical ethics means that concerns over quality in this area warrant specific attention by those concerned with declining standards in bioethics and those working in clinical ethics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)357-360
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of medical ethics
Volume34
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2008

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health(social science)
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The quality of bioethics debate: Implications for clinical ethics committees'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this