The Questionable Ecological Validity of Ecological Momentary Assessment: Considerations for Design and Analysis

Nilam Ram, Miriam Brinberg, Aaron L. Pincus, David E. Conroy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

75 Scopus citations

Abstract

Experience sampling, diary, ecological momentary assessment, ambulatory monitoring, and related methods are part of a research tradition aimed at capturing the ongoing stream of individuals’ behavior in real-world situations. By design, these approaches prioritize ecological validity. This article examines how the purported ecological validity these study designs provide may be compromised during data analysis. After briefly outlining the benefits of ecological momentary assessment-type designs, the authors highlight design issues that threaten ecological validity, illustrate how the typical multilevel analysis of ecological momentary assessment-type data can compromise generalizability to “real-life,” and consider how unobtrusive monitoring and person-specific analysis may provide for more precise descriptions of individuals’ actual human ecology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)253-270
Number of pages18
JournalResearch in Human Development
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 3 2017

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Questionable Ecological Validity of Ecological Momentary Assessment: Considerations for Design and Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this