TY - JOUR
T1 - The relative importance of intra- and intersexual selection on human male sexually dimorphic traits
AU - Kordsmeyer, Tobias L.
AU - Hunt, John
AU - Puts, David A.
AU - Ostner, Julia
AU - Penke, Lars
N1 - Funding Information:
We acknowledge support by the Leibniz Association through funding for the Leibniz ScienceCampus Primate Cognition. We thank Rike Arkenau, Julia Jünger and Christoph Schild for support with the data collection.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2018/7
Y1 - 2018/7
N2 - Recent evidence suggests that in sexual selection on human males, intrasexual competition plays a larger role than female choice. In a sample of men (N = 164), we sought to provide further evidence on the effects of men's physical dominance and sexual attractiveness on mating success and hence in sexual selection. Objective measures and subjective ratings of male sexually dimorphic traits purportedly under sexual selection (height, vocal and facial masculinity, upper body size from 3D scans, physical strength, and baseline testosterone) and observer perceptions of physical dominance and sexual attractiveness based on self-presentation video recordings were assessed and associated with mating success (sociosexual behaviour and number of potential conceptions) in a partly longitudinal design. Results from structural equation models and selection analyses revealed that physical dominance, but not sexual attractiveness, predicted mating success. Physical dominance mediated associations of upper body size, physical strength, as well as vocal and facial physical dominance and attractiveness with mating success. These findings thus suggest a greater importance of intrasexual competition than female choice in human male sexual selection.
AB - Recent evidence suggests that in sexual selection on human males, intrasexual competition plays a larger role than female choice. In a sample of men (N = 164), we sought to provide further evidence on the effects of men's physical dominance and sexual attractiveness on mating success and hence in sexual selection. Objective measures and subjective ratings of male sexually dimorphic traits purportedly under sexual selection (height, vocal and facial masculinity, upper body size from 3D scans, physical strength, and baseline testosterone) and observer perceptions of physical dominance and sexual attractiveness based on self-presentation video recordings were assessed and associated with mating success (sociosexual behaviour and number of potential conceptions) in a partly longitudinal design. Results from structural equation models and selection analyses revealed that physical dominance, but not sexual attractiveness, predicted mating success. Physical dominance mediated associations of upper body size, physical strength, as well as vocal and facial physical dominance and attractiveness with mating success. These findings thus suggest a greater importance of intrasexual competition than female choice in human male sexual selection.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048342553&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048342553&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.03.008
DO - 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.03.008
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85048342553
SN - 1090-5138
VL - 39
SP - 424
EP - 436
JO - Evolution and Human Behavior
JF - Evolution and Human Behavior
IS - 4
ER -