TY - JOUR
T1 - The response of catarrhine primates to Pleistocene environmental fluctuations in East Asia
AU - Jablonski, Nina G.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements. The author gratefully acknowledges the Australian Research Council for providing financial support for this research. Sincere thanks go to JANE BAILEYf or maintenance of the Eurasian Fossil Mammal Database and to NOLAR OBERTS-SMITHa nd MATT WHITFORTf or their GIS expertise and for production of the paleoenvironmental and distribution maps.
PY - 1998/1
Y1 - 1998/1
N2 - Examination of the patterns of distribution for five catarrhine genera (Gigantopithecus, Pongo, Hylobates, Macaca, and Rhinopithecus) during the Pleistocene and Holecene in China indicates that the geographical ranges of individual genera shifted independently of one another in response to conditions of incrsaing seasonlity. All genera examined saw their distributions shift southward, with the shifting subtropical and tropical zones, during the pleistocene. This occurred earlier in the pleistocene for the larger apes, and later for smaller forms. This apparent paradox is readily explained by the inability of large-bodied apes to satisfy the high metabolic demands of a relatively large brain as well those of an abosolutely larger body, Monkeys were somewhat less affected and their greater relative success is attributed to their abilities to survive in more highly seasonal environment by exploiting a wider variety of Plant foods and to produce offapring more quickly, thanks to shorter gestation times and shorter interbirth intervals.
AB - Examination of the patterns of distribution for five catarrhine genera (Gigantopithecus, Pongo, Hylobates, Macaca, and Rhinopithecus) during the Pleistocene and Holecene in China indicates that the geographical ranges of individual genera shifted independently of one another in response to conditions of incrsaing seasonlity. All genera examined saw their distributions shift southward, with the shifting subtropical and tropical zones, during the pleistocene. This occurred earlier in the pleistocene for the larger apes, and later for smaller forms. This apparent paradox is readily explained by the inability of large-bodied apes to satisfy the high metabolic demands of a relatively large brain as well those of an abosolutely larger body, Monkeys were somewhat less affected and their greater relative success is attributed to their abilities to survive in more highly seasonal environment by exploiting a wider variety of Plant foods and to produce offapring more quickly, thanks to shorter gestation times and shorter interbirth intervals.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031748617&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031748617&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/BF02557741
DO - 10.1007/BF02557741
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0031748617
SN - 0032-8332
VL - 39
SP - 29
EP - 37
JO - Primates
JF - Primates
IS - 1
ER -