Abstract
Examination of the patterns of distribution for five catarrhine genera (Gigantopithecus, Pongo, Hylobates, Macaca, and Rhinopithecus) during the Pleistocene and Holecene in China indicates that the geographical ranges of individual genera shifted independently of one another in response to conditions of incrsaing seasonlity. All genera examined saw their distributions shift southward, with the shifting subtropical and tropical zones, during the pleistocene. This occurred earlier in the pleistocene for the larger apes, and later for smaller forms. This apparent paradox is readily explained by the inability of large-bodied apes to satisfy the high metabolic demands of a relatively large brain as well those of an abosolutely larger body, Monkeys were somewhat less affected and their greater relative success is attributed to their abilities to survive in more highly seasonal environment by exploiting a wider variety of Plant foods and to produce offapring more quickly, thanks to shorter gestation times and shorter interbirth intervals.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 29-37 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Primates |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1998 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Animal Science and Zoology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The response of catarrhine primates to Pleistocene environmental fluctuations in East Asia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver