TY - JOUR
T1 - The Role of Prosody and Explicit Instruction in Processing Instruction
AU - Henry, Nick
AU - Jackson, Carrie N.
AU - Dimidio, Jack
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported in part by a National Science Foundation Dissertation Improvement Grant (BCS-1252109). Portions of this research were presented at the 2015 Second Language Research Forum in Atlanta, GA. We would like to thank Bill VanPatten and Juliane Schicker for their roles in stimulus development. We would also like to thank Liese Sippel for her help with data collection, as well as all of the instructors that allowed us into their classrooms.
Publisher Copyright:
©2017 The Modern Language Journal
PY - 2017/6/1
Y1 - 2017/6/1
N2 - This study investigates the role of prosodic cues and explicit information (EI) in the acquisition of German accusative case markers. We compared 4 groups of 3rd-semester learners (low intermediate level) who completed 1 of 4 Processing Instruction (PI) treatments that manipulated the presence or absence of EI and focused prosody. The results showed that, when training included EI or prosodic cues, the groups improved on comprehension and production tasks in an immediate posttest. Four weeks after training, the groups sustained gains on the comprehension task, but not on the production task. Participants who did not receive EI or prosody only showed improvement on the comprehension task in the immediate posttest and did not sustain these gains. These findings replicate previous findings on the role of EI in PI, showing an advantage for EI with the target form (e.g., Henry, Culman, & VanPatten, 2009). Moreover, the results suggest that prosodic cues help learners process morphosyntactic forms, and that they can enhance grammar instruction.
AB - This study investigates the role of prosodic cues and explicit information (EI) in the acquisition of German accusative case markers. We compared 4 groups of 3rd-semester learners (low intermediate level) who completed 1 of 4 Processing Instruction (PI) treatments that manipulated the presence or absence of EI and focused prosody. The results showed that, when training included EI or prosodic cues, the groups improved on comprehension and production tasks in an immediate posttest. Four weeks after training, the groups sustained gains on the comprehension task, but not on the production task. Participants who did not receive EI or prosody only showed improvement on the comprehension task in the immediate posttest and did not sustain these gains. These findings replicate previous findings on the role of EI in PI, showing an advantage for EI with the target form (e.g., Henry, Culman, & VanPatten, 2009). Moreover, the results suggest that prosodic cues help learners process morphosyntactic forms, and that they can enhance grammar instruction.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018383347&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018383347&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/modl.12397
DO - 10.1111/modl.12397
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85018383347
SN - 0026-7902
VL - 101
SP - 294
EP - 314
JO - Modern Language Journal
JF - Modern Language Journal
IS - 2
ER -