The root of journalistic plagiarism: Contested attribution beliefs

Norman P. Lewis, Bu Zhong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations


Journalists condemn plagiarism, yet rarely acknowledge disagreements over attribution standards. To document and evaluate those differences, journalists in broadcasting and print operations were surveyed (N = 953). Respondents were far less willing to attribute press releases than they were their colleagues' work. They were more likely to consider attribution optional if they were under pressure to produce, worked for a broadcast medium, were a content creator, were less experienced, or saw their principles as flexible. The findings reveal that attribution beliefs are far more pliant than ethics policies suggest and illuminate some of the reasons why plagiarism occurs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)148-166
Number of pages19
JournalJournalism and Mass Communication Quarterly
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 2013

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication


Dive into the research topics of 'The root of journalistic plagiarism: Contested attribution beliefs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this