TY - JOUR
T1 - The roots of phylogeny
T2 - How did Haeckel build his trees?
AU - Dayrat, Benoît
N1 - Funding Information:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work has been discussed among two circles of systematists. I am grateful to all members of the systematics discussion group of the California Academy of Sciences and of the meetings of the Bay Area Biosystematists (San Francisco Bay Area, CA) for their comments. I am grateful to Marilyn Eversole, Mónica Medina, Amanda Grimes, Claude Dupuis, Michael Ghiselin, Kenneth Angielczyk, Rasmus Winther, Kevin Padian, Thomas Bach, and Simon Tillier for their help with the manuscript and their valuable suggestions. I am specifically grateful to Claude Dupuis and Michael Ghiselin, with whom I had many exciting discussions. Associate Editor Peter Linder and two anonymous reviewers provided suggestions that really improved the manuscript. This work was completed with support from the National Science Foundation (PEET DEB-9978155 and PEET DEB-9521930), the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, and the California Academy of Sciences.
PY - 2003/8
Y1 - 2003/8
N2 - Haeckel created much of our current vocabulary in evolutionary biology, such as the term phylogeny, which is currently used to designate trees. Assuming that Haeckel gave the same meaning to this term, one often reproduces Haeckel's trees as the first illustrations of phylogenetic trees. A detailed analysis of Haeckel's own evolutionary vocabulary and theory revealed that Haeckel's trees were genealogical trees and that Haeckel's phylogeny was a morphological concept. However, phylogeny was actually the core of Haeckel's tree reconstruction, and understanding the exact meaning Haeckel gave to phylogeny is crucial to understanding the information Haeckel wanted to convey in his famous trees. Haeckel's phylogeny was a linear series of main morphological stages along the line of descent of a given species. The phylogeny of a single species would provide a trunk around which lateral branches were added as mere ornament; the phylogeny selected for drawing a tree of a given group was considered the most complete line of progress from lower to higher forms of this group, such as the phylogeny of Man for the genealogical tree of Vertebrates. Haeckel's phylogeny was mainly inspired by the idea of the scala naturae, or scale of being. Therefore, Haeckel's genealogical trees, which were only branched on the surface, mainly represented the old idea of scale of being. Even though Haeckel decided to draw genealogical trees after reading On the Origin of Species and was called the German Darwin, he did not draw Darwinian branching diagrams. Although Haeckel always saw Lamarck, Goethe, and Darwin as the three fathers of the theory of evolution, he was mainly influenced by Lamarck and Goethe in his approach to tree reconstruction.
AB - Haeckel created much of our current vocabulary in evolutionary biology, such as the term phylogeny, which is currently used to designate trees. Assuming that Haeckel gave the same meaning to this term, one often reproduces Haeckel's trees as the first illustrations of phylogenetic trees. A detailed analysis of Haeckel's own evolutionary vocabulary and theory revealed that Haeckel's trees were genealogical trees and that Haeckel's phylogeny was a morphological concept. However, phylogeny was actually the core of Haeckel's tree reconstruction, and understanding the exact meaning Haeckel gave to phylogeny is crucial to understanding the information Haeckel wanted to convey in his famous trees. Haeckel's phylogeny was a linear series of main morphological stages along the line of descent of a given species. The phylogeny of a single species would provide a trunk around which lateral branches were added as mere ornament; the phylogeny selected for drawing a tree of a given group was considered the most complete line of progress from lower to higher forms of this group, such as the phylogeny of Man for the genealogical tree of Vertebrates. Haeckel's phylogeny was mainly inspired by the idea of the scala naturae, or scale of being. Therefore, Haeckel's genealogical trees, which were only branched on the surface, mainly represented the old idea of scale of being. Even though Haeckel decided to draw genealogical trees after reading On the Origin of Species and was called the German Darwin, he did not draw Darwinian branching diagrams. Although Haeckel always saw Lamarck, Goethe, and Darwin as the three fathers of the theory of evolution, he was mainly influenced by Lamarck and Goethe in his approach to tree reconstruction.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042570398&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0042570398&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10635150309310
DO - 10.1080/10635150309310
M3 - Article
C2 - 12857642
AN - SCOPUS:0042570398
SN - 1063-5157
VL - 52
SP - 515
EP - 527
JO - Systematic Biology
JF - Systematic Biology
IS - 4
ER -