TY - JOUR
T1 - The Safety Profile of Liposomal Bupivacaine Use in Septorhinoplasty
AU - Staity, Ghazal
AU - Saadi, Robert A.
AU - Pool, Christopher
AU - Lighthall, Jessyka G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Inc.
PY - 2022/6/1
Y1 - 2022/6/1
N2 - Objective: To evaluate the safety profile, including adverse drug reactions and operative complications, of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) use for local anesthesia during functional septorhinoplasty. Study Design: Retrospective review. Subject and Methods: A database query was conducted for patients >18 years of age who underwent septorhinoplasty from January 1, 2019, to August 1, 2020. Adverse drug reactions and postoperative outcomes were compared between patients who received locally administered LB and patients who received standard local anesthetic at the completion of the surgery. Results: A total of 95 cases were included in our data analysis. No significant differences were found in adverse reactions overall (6.3% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.51) or complications, including rate of infection (3.2% vs. 3.1%, p = 1), cartilage warping (1.6% vs. 0%, p = 1), graft resorption (0% vs. 0%, p = 1), septal hematoma (0% vs. 0%, p = 1), and need for revision surgery (4.8% vs. 3.1%, p = 1) between LB and control groups. Conclusion: LB demonstrated an acceptable safety profile when compared with standard local anesthetics during septorhinoplasty, with no significant difference in systemic or local adverse drug reactions or postoperative complications.
AB - Objective: To evaluate the safety profile, including adverse drug reactions and operative complications, of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) use for local anesthesia during functional septorhinoplasty. Study Design: Retrospective review. Subject and Methods: A database query was conducted for patients >18 years of age who underwent septorhinoplasty from January 1, 2019, to August 1, 2020. Adverse drug reactions and postoperative outcomes were compared between patients who received locally administered LB and patients who received standard local anesthetic at the completion of the surgery. Results: A total of 95 cases were included in our data analysis. No significant differences were found in adverse reactions overall (6.3% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.51) or complications, including rate of infection (3.2% vs. 3.1%, p = 1), cartilage warping (1.6% vs. 0%, p = 1), graft resorption (0% vs. 0%, p = 1), septal hematoma (0% vs. 0%, p = 1), and need for revision surgery (4.8% vs. 3.1%, p = 1) between LB and control groups. Conclusion: LB demonstrated an acceptable safety profile when compared with standard local anesthetics during septorhinoplasty, with no significant difference in systemic or local adverse drug reactions or postoperative complications.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127118300&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85127118300&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0544
DO - 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0544
M3 - Article
C2 - 33617355
AN - SCOPUS:85127118300
SN - 2689-3614
VL - 24
SP - 202
EP - 206
JO - Facial Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine
JF - Facial Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine
IS - 3
ER -