TY - JOUR
T1 - The Sensitivity of Adolescent School-Based Hearing Screens Is Significantly Improved by Adding High Frequencies
AU - Sekhar, Deepa
AU - Zalewski, Thomas R.
AU - Beiler, Jessica S.
AU - Czarnecki, Beth
AU - Barr, Ashley L.
AU - King, Tonya
AU - Paul, Ian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, © The Author(s) 2016.
PY - 2016/12/1
Y1 - 2016/12/1
N2 - High frequency hearing loss (HFHL), often related to hazardous noise, affects one in six U.S. adolescents. Yet, only 20 states include school-based hearing screens for adolescents. Only six states test multiple high frequencies. Study objectives were to (1) compare the sensitivity of state school-based hearing screens for adolescents to gold standard sound-treated booth testing and (2) consider the effect of adding multiple high frequencies and two-step screening on sensitivity/specificity. Of 134 eleventh-grade participants (2013–2014), 43 of the 134 (32%) did not pass sound-treated booth testing, and 27 of the 43 (63%) had HFHL. Sensitivity/specificity of the most common protocol (1,000, 2,000, 4,000 Hz at 20 dB HL) for these hearing losses was 25.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] = [13.5, 41.2]) and 85.7% (95% CI [76.8, 92.2]), respectively. A protocol including 500, 1,000, 2,000, 4,000, 6,000 Hz at 20 dB HL significantly improved sensitivity to 76.7% (95% CI [61.4, 88.2]), p <.001. Two-step screening maintained specificity (84.6%, 95% CI [75.5, 91.3]). Adolescent school-based hearing screen sensitivity improves with high frequencies.
AB - High frequency hearing loss (HFHL), often related to hazardous noise, affects one in six U.S. adolescents. Yet, only 20 states include school-based hearing screens for adolescents. Only six states test multiple high frequencies. Study objectives were to (1) compare the sensitivity of state school-based hearing screens for adolescents to gold standard sound-treated booth testing and (2) consider the effect of adding multiple high frequencies and two-step screening on sensitivity/specificity. Of 134 eleventh-grade participants (2013–2014), 43 of the 134 (32%) did not pass sound-treated booth testing, and 27 of the 43 (63%) had HFHL. Sensitivity/specificity of the most common protocol (1,000, 2,000, 4,000 Hz at 20 dB HL) for these hearing losses was 25.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] = [13.5, 41.2]) and 85.7% (95% CI [76.8, 92.2]), respectively. A protocol including 500, 1,000, 2,000, 4,000, 6,000 Hz at 20 dB HL significantly improved sensitivity to 76.7% (95% CI [61.4, 88.2]), p <.001. Two-step screening maintained specificity (84.6%, 95% CI [75.5, 91.3]). Adolescent school-based hearing screen sensitivity improves with high frequencies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994087061&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994087061&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1059840516654004
DO - 10.1177/1059840516654004
M3 - Article
C2 - 27302960
AN - SCOPUS:84994087061
SN - 1059-8405
VL - 32
SP - 416
EP - 422
JO - Journal of School Nursing
JF - Journal of School Nursing
IS - 6
ER -