TY - JOUR
T1 - The shackles of ceo celebrity
T2 - Sociocognitive and behavioral role constraints on “star” leaders
AU - Lovelace, Jeffrey B.
AU - Bundy, Jonathan
AU - Hambrick, Donald C.
AU - Pollock, Timothy G.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank John Busenbark, Guoli Chen, Craig Crossland, Cindy Devers, Patrick Haack, Vilmos Misangyi, Mike Pfarrer, and Mike Withers for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript. We would also like to thank participants from the 2016 Reputation Symposium hosted by the Oxford University Centre for Corporate Reputation. Finally, we are grateful to our associate editor and three reviewers for their insights and support throughout this process.
Publisher Copyright:
© Academy of Management Review.
PY - 2018/7
Y1 - 2018/7
N2 - We set forth a new theory for understanding the consequences of CEO celebrity. The fulcrum of our theory is the reality that CEOs attain celebrity because they are cast into specific archetypes, rather than for their general achievements. We present a typology of common celebrity CEO archetypes (creator, transformer, rebel, savior) and then detail a model highlighting the consequences associated with attaining celebrity of a given type. These consequences include an array of sociocognitive outcomes, which, in turn, constrain celebrity CEOs to those behaviors associated with their particular celebrity archetype. The sociocognitive outcomes’ main effects are moderated by the role intensity of the specific archetype, the CEO’s degree of narcissism, and the temporal arc (rate of ascent and duration) of celebrity. Finally, we argue that the effects of CEO celebrity on firm performance are contingent on the continuity of external and internal contextual conditions. If conditions change appreciably, the celebrity CEO’s rigidities become severe liabilities, explaining the documented tendency for CEO celebrity to bring about, on average, unfavorable firm outcomes.
AB - We set forth a new theory for understanding the consequences of CEO celebrity. The fulcrum of our theory is the reality that CEOs attain celebrity because they are cast into specific archetypes, rather than for their general achievements. We present a typology of common celebrity CEO archetypes (creator, transformer, rebel, savior) and then detail a model highlighting the consequences associated with attaining celebrity of a given type. These consequences include an array of sociocognitive outcomes, which, in turn, constrain celebrity CEOs to those behaviors associated with their particular celebrity archetype. The sociocognitive outcomes’ main effects are moderated by the role intensity of the specific archetype, the CEO’s degree of narcissism, and the temporal arc (rate of ascent and duration) of celebrity. Finally, we argue that the effects of CEO celebrity on firm performance are contingent on the continuity of external and internal contextual conditions. If conditions change appreciably, the celebrity CEO’s rigidities become severe liabilities, explaining the documented tendency for CEO celebrity to bring about, on average, unfavorable firm outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049775703&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049775703&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5465/amr.2016.0064
DO - 10.5465/amr.2016.0064
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85049775703
SN - 0363-7425
VL - 43
SP - 419
EP - 444
JO - Academy of Management Review
JF - Academy of Management Review
IS - 3
ER -