Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The sources of leader violence: A comparison of ideological and non-ideological leaders

  • Michael D. Mumford
  • , Jazmine Espejo
  • , Samuel T. Hunter
  • , Katrina E. Bedell-Avers
  • , Dawn L. Eubanks
  • , Shane Connelly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Recent events have called attention to the potential of ideological leaders to incite violence. The present study examined 80 historically notable leaders. Violent and non-violent leaders were compared to violent and non-violent ideological leaders in a historiometric analysis examining individual, group, organization, and environmental variables that might predispose ideological leaders to violence. When criteria examining different manifestations of violence were regressed on the discriminant function scores resulting from this comparison of leader types, it was found that attributes of ideological leadership influenced the amount of violence, and the occurrence of institutional and cultural violence - accounting for variance in institutional and cultural violence above and beyond characteristics of leaders, in general, found to contribute to violence. The implications of these observations for understanding the sources of leader violence and the origins of violence among ideological leaders are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)217-235
Number of pages19
JournalLeadership Quarterly
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2007

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The sources of leader violence: A comparison of ideological and non-ideological leaders'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this