TY - JOUR
T1 - The strategy-specific nature of improvement
T2 - The Power Law Applies by Strategy Within Task
AU - Delaney, Peter F.
AU - Reder, Lynne M.
AU - Staszewski, James J.
AU - Ritter, Frank E.
N1 - Funding Information:
Preparation of this manuscript was facilitated by grants from the National Science Foundation (BNS-8908030), National Institute of Mental Health (1R01 MH52808-01), Office of Naval Research (N00014-95-1-0223), and Air Force Office of Scientific Research (F49620-97-1-0054). The authors would like to thank M. Bajcz, D. Banks, C. Genovese, S. Hecht, and D. Owen. We would also like to thank J.R. Anderson, M.S. Ayers, J.E. Beck, K.A. Ericsson, A.E. Hilliard, A.C. Lehmann, M. Lovett, R. Mahadevan, J. Nerb, C.D. Schunn, and J. Winchester for their helpful comments and advice.
PY - 1998/1
Y1 - 1998/1
N2 - If strategy shifts spend up performance, learning curves should show discontinuities where such shifts occur. Relatively smooth curves appear consistently in the literature, however. To explore this incongruity, we examined learning when multiple strategies were used. We plotted power law learning curves for aggregated data from four mental arithmetic experiments and then plotted similar curves separately for each participant and strategy. We then evaluated the fits achieved by each group of curves. In all four experiments, plotting separated by strategy produced significantly better fits to individual participants' data than did plotting a single power function. We conclude that improvement of solution time is better explained by practice on a strategy than by practice on a task, and that careful assessment of trial-by-trial changes in strategy can improve understanding of the effects of practice on learning.
AB - If strategy shifts spend up performance, learning curves should show discontinuities where such shifts occur. Relatively smooth curves appear consistently in the literature, however. To explore this incongruity, we examined learning when multiple strategies were used. We plotted power law learning curves for aggregated data from four mental arithmetic experiments and then plotted similar curves separately for each participant and strategy. We then evaluated the fits achieved by each group of curves. In all four experiments, plotting separated by strategy produced significantly better fits to individual participants' data than did plotting a single power function. We conclude that improvement of solution time is better explained by practice on a strategy than by practice on a task, and that careful assessment of trial-by-trial changes in strategy can improve understanding of the effects of practice on learning.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0344195099&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0344195099&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1467-9280.00001
DO - 10.1111/1467-9280.00001
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0344195099
SN - 0956-7976
VL - 9
SP - 1
EP - 7
JO - Psychological Science
JF - Psychological Science
IS - 1
ER -