The Trial of Meursault

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This essay focuses on Kamel Daoud’s “response” to Albert Camus’s L’Étranger by highlighting the differences in and implications of their writing styles and narrative voices. Daoud’s narrative refigures the concept of the absurd and his linkage of Camus’s silences to the colonial condition. However, the colonial legacy continues to pervade Daoud’s own narrative particularly in his portrayal of contemporary Algeria and Islam. There are unresolved contradictions in the fabric of Daoud’s text as well as a silence that emerges from a hyperbolic bavardage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)316-332
Number of pages17
JournalRomanic Review
Volume111
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Arts and Humanities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Trial of Meursault'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this