TY - JOUR
T1 - The use of laparoscopy in ventriculoperitoneal shunt revisions
AU - Martin, Kathryn
AU - Baird, Robert
AU - Farmer, Jean Pierre
AU - Emil, Sherif
AU - Laberge, Jean Martin
AU - Shaw, Kenneth
AU - Puligandla, Pramod
PY - 2011/11
Y1 - 2011/11
N2 - Introduction: Ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPSs) are routinely placed in children with hydrocephalus. However, they often encounter problems, and revisions are frequent. We sought to evaluate our institutional experience with laparoscopic-assisted VPS revisions. Methods: With institutional review board approval, a retrospective chart review of 17 consecutive patients who underwent 19 laparoscopic-assisted VPS revisions was conducted. Data extracted included patient demographics, indications for laparoscopic-assisted revision, complications, and shunt outcomes. Results: The median age at revision was 12 years (0.4-20 years). Ten children (58.8%) had 2 or more previous VPS revisions. Indications for laparoscopic revision included adhesive obstruction, broken shunt retrieval, cerebrospinal fluid pseudocyst, diagnostic laparoscopy, and conversion from ventriculoatrial shunt to VPS. Three patients required repeat VPS revision for distal shunt failure, whereas 2 patients required repeat VPS revision for proximal dysfunction. Failures occurred 5 to 258 days after laparoscopic-assisted revision. Median follow-up was 21 weeks (interquartile range, 6-57 weeks). No patients developed abdominal infections postoperatively. Conclusion: Laparoscopy is useful in select patients with distal VPS failure. Patients with multiple previous revisions, prior abdominal surgery, previous intraperitoneal infections, broken devices, or cerebrospinal fluid pseudocysts may benefit from this approach. Further prospective studies with long-term follow-up are needed to determine which patients benefit most from the laparoscopic-assisted approach.
AB - Introduction: Ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPSs) are routinely placed in children with hydrocephalus. However, they often encounter problems, and revisions are frequent. We sought to evaluate our institutional experience with laparoscopic-assisted VPS revisions. Methods: With institutional review board approval, a retrospective chart review of 17 consecutive patients who underwent 19 laparoscopic-assisted VPS revisions was conducted. Data extracted included patient demographics, indications for laparoscopic-assisted revision, complications, and shunt outcomes. Results: The median age at revision was 12 years (0.4-20 years). Ten children (58.8%) had 2 or more previous VPS revisions. Indications for laparoscopic revision included adhesive obstruction, broken shunt retrieval, cerebrospinal fluid pseudocyst, diagnostic laparoscopy, and conversion from ventriculoatrial shunt to VPS. Three patients required repeat VPS revision for distal shunt failure, whereas 2 patients required repeat VPS revision for proximal dysfunction. Failures occurred 5 to 258 days after laparoscopic-assisted revision. Median follow-up was 21 weeks (interquartile range, 6-57 weeks). No patients developed abdominal infections postoperatively. Conclusion: Laparoscopy is useful in select patients with distal VPS failure. Patients with multiple previous revisions, prior abdominal surgery, previous intraperitoneal infections, broken devices, or cerebrospinal fluid pseudocysts may benefit from this approach. Further prospective studies with long-term follow-up are needed to determine which patients benefit most from the laparoscopic-assisted approach.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80855127514&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80855127514&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.07.001
DO - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.07.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 22075347
AN - SCOPUS:80855127514
SN - 0022-3468
VL - 46
SP - 2146
EP - 2150
JO - Journal of pediatric surgery
JF - Journal of pediatric surgery
IS - 11
ER -