TY - JOUR
T1 - The utility of person-specific analyses for investigating developmental processes
T2 - An analytic primer on studying the individual
AU - Gayles, Jochebed G.
AU - Molenaar, Peter C.M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded by the National Institutes of Drug Abuse (NIDA) Institutional Pre-doctoral NRSA Training Program, T32 DA017629, awarded to Prevention Research Center for the Study of Human Development and The Methodology Center at the Pennsylvania State University.
Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2013/11
Y1 - 2013/11
N2 - The fields of psychology and human development are experiencing a resurgence of scientific inquiries about phenomena that unfold at the level of the individual. This article addresses the issues of analyzing intraindividual psychological/developmental phenomena using standard analytical techniques for interindividual variation. When phenomena are characterized by intraindividual variation, analyses must be done at the level of the individual. Research on these processes generally uses methods analyzing interindividual variation, rather than intraindividual, however, a noteworthy fundamental difference exists between the two. The current article provides theoretical and empirical illustrations of the fundamental contrast between variation within subjects and variation between subjects. First, we explain this distinction through the classical ergodic theorems. Next, we discuss the utility of analysis of intraindividual variation for developmental processes. We then provide an empirical example, using recently-developed methods for analyzing person-specific developmental processes. This article presents for the first time a methodological approach in which first the factor model is determined by exploratory and confirmatory P-technique, and then in a separate second phase the dynamic model for the latent factor series is determined.
AB - The fields of psychology and human development are experiencing a resurgence of scientific inquiries about phenomena that unfold at the level of the individual. This article addresses the issues of analyzing intraindividual psychological/developmental phenomena using standard analytical techniques for interindividual variation. When phenomena are characterized by intraindividual variation, analyses must be done at the level of the individual. Research on these processes generally uses methods analyzing interindividual variation, rather than intraindividual, however, a noteworthy fundamental difference exists between the two. The current article provides theoretical and empirical illustrations of the fundamental contrast between variation within subjects and variation between subjects. First, we explain this distinction through the classical ergodic theorems. Next, we discuss the utility of analysis of intraindividual variation for developmental processes. We then provide an empirical example, using recently-developed methods for analyzing person-specific developmental processes. This article presents for the first time a methodological approach in which first the factor model is determined by exploratory and confirmatory P-technique, and then in a separate second phase the dynamic model for the latent factor series is determined.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887484628&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887484628&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0165025413504857
DO - 10.1177/0165025413504857
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84887484628
SN - 0165-0254
VL - 37
SP - 549
EP - 562
JO - International Journal of Behavioral Development
JF - International Journal of Behavioral Development
IS - 6
ER -