Abstract
This study examines the value that prior CEO experience has for the companies that hire such CEOs—as reflected in the firms’ subsequent market-based performance—as well as its value for the CEO that possesses this experience—as reflected in his or her initial compensation. While we suggest that shareholders tend not to benefit from firms hiring experienced CEOs, we also argue that particular firm and industry contextual factors that shaped the prior CEO experience help ameliorate this detrimental effect. Regardless, we also suggest that prior CEO experience generally stands to benefit the CEOs, in that it brings them a compensation premium over those CEOs without such prior experience. We tested our hypotheses on a sample of 654 US CEO succession events that occurred between 2001 and 2004 and found broad support for our hypotheses. We close with a discussion of the implications of our findings for future research as well as what they mean for firms hiring experienced CEOs and for CEO careers more generally.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 243-265 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Human Resource Management |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 1 2017 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Applied Psychology
- Strategy and Management
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Management of Technology and Innovation