TY - JOUR
T1 - The value of manure - Manure as co-product in life cycle assessment
AU - Leip, Adrian
AU - Ledgard, Stewart
AU - Uwizeye, Aimable
AU - Palhares, Julio C.P.
AU - Aller, M. Fernanda
AU - Amon, Barbara
AU - Binder, Michael
AU - Cordovil, Claudia M.d.S.
AU - De Camillis, Camillo
AU - Dong, Hongming
AU - Fusi, Alessandra
AU - Helin, Janne
AU - Hörtenhuber, Stefan
AU - Hristov, Alexander N.
AU - Koelsch, Richard
AU - Liu, Chunjiang
AU - Masso, Cargele
AU - Nkongolo, Nsalambi V.
AU - Patra, Amlan K.
AU - Redding, Matthew R.
AU - Rufino, Mariana C.
AU - Sakrabani, Ruben
AU - Thoma, Greg
AU - Vertès, Françoise
AU - Wang, Ying
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Authors
PY - 2019/7/1
Y1 - 2019/7/1
N2 - Livestock production is important for food security, nutrition, and landscape maintenance, but it is associated with several environmental impacts. To assess the risk and benefits arising from livestock production, transparent and robust indicators are required, such as those offered by life cycle assessment. A central question in such approaches is how environmental burden is allocated to livestock products and to manure that is re-used for agricultural production. To incentivize sustainable use of manure, it should be considered as a co-product as long as it is not disposed of, or wasted, or applied in excess of crop nutrient needs, in which case it should be treated as a waste. This paper proposes a theoretical approach to define nutrient requirements based on nutrient response curves to economic and physical optima and a pragmatic approach based on crop nutrient yield adjusted for nutrient losses to atmosphere and water. Allocation of environmental burden to manure and other livestock products is then based on the nutrient value from manure for crop production using the price of fertilizer nutrients. We illustrate and discuss the proposed method with two case studies.
AB - Livestock production is important for food security, nutrition, and landscape maintenance, but it is associated with several environmental impacts. To assess the risk and benefits arising from livestock production, transparent and robust indicators are required, such as those offered by life cycle assessment. A central question in such approaches is how environmental burden is allocated to livestock products and to manure that is re-used for agricultural production. To incentivize sustainable use of manure, it should be considered as a co-product as long as it is not disposed of, or wasted, or applied in excess of crop nutrient needs, in which case it should be treated as a waste. This paper proposes a theoretical approach to define nutrient requirements based on nutrient response curves to economic and physical optima and a pragmatic approach based on crop nutrient yield adjusted for nutrient losses to atmosphere and water. Allocation of environmental burden to manure and other livestock products is then based on the nutrient value from manure for crop production using the price of fertilizer nutrients. We illustrate and discuss the proposed method with two case studies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064882365&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064882365&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.059
DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.059
M3 - Article
C2 - 31009817
AN - SCOPUS:85064882365
SN - 0301-4797
VL - 241
SP - 293
EP - 304
JO - Journal of Environmental Management
JF - Journal of Environmental Management
ER -