TY - JOUR
T1 - The work of sterile processing departments
T2 - An exploratory study using qualitative interviews and a quantitative process database
AU - Brooks, Joanna Veazey
AU - Williams, Jessica A.R.
AU - Gorbenko, Ksenia
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding/support: The qualitative data collection was funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HHSA2902010000271).We would like to thank Charles L. Bosk and Catherine van de Ruit for their roles in the broader project, our colleagues at the Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality at Johns Hopkins Medicine, and undergraduate research assistants at the University of Pennsylvania. We are also thankful to the participating hospitals and each of our interviewees, who graciously shared their experiences with us. In addition, we wish to thank Karynn Glover and Jennifer Helfenberger for their research assistance. Funding/support: The qualitative data collection was funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HHSA2902010000271).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc.
PY - 2019/7
Y1 - 2019/7
N2 - Background: The sterile processing of surgical instruments and equipment is an essential part of surgical operations. Although clean instruments prevent infections, little is known about the departments that conduct this work. We sought to describe sterile processing departments (SPDs) and to identify factors impacting them. Methods: We analyzed data from 22 qualitative interviews of staff and managers and a quantitative benchmarking database. Results: Qualitative results indicated 4 primary factors impacting sterile processing work: (1) role and visibility, (2) relationships and communication with other departments and vendors, (3) staffing and management, and (4) technical problems and solutions. Quantitative analysis revealed significant differences in SPD responsibilities and scope. Discussion: Relationships with operating room staff were of paramount importance in the ability of the SPD to accomplish its job and in staff motivations and feelings. Differences in management practices, communication strategies, and problem-solving resources were also emphasized. Both quantitative and qualitative data showed concern for the role of the SPD in patient safety, particularly concerning practices such as the use of immediate-use steam sterilization. Conclusions: To more completely address adverse patient events and surgical patient safety, we must move toward examining the entire surgical process, including the vital role of SPDs.
AB - Background: The sterile processing of surgical instruments and equipment is an essential part of surgical operations. Although clean instruments prevent infections, little is known about the departments that conduct this work. We sought to describe sterile processing departments (SPDs) and to identify factors impacting them. Methods: We analyzed data from 22 qualitative interviews of staff and managers and a quantitative benchmarking database. Results: Qualitative results indicated 4 primary factors impacting sterile processing work: (1) role and visibility, (2) relationships and communication with other departments and vendors, (3) staffing and management, and (4) technical problems and solutions. Quantitative analysis revealed significant differences in SPD responsibilities and scope. Discussion: Relationships with operating room staff were of paramount importance in the ability of the SPD to accomplish its job and in staff motivations and feelings. Differences in management practices, communication strategies, and problem-solving resources were also emphasized. Both quantitative and qualitative data showed concern for the role of the SPD in patient safety, particularly concerning practices such as the use of immediate-use steam sterilization. Conclusions: To more completely address adverse patient events and surgical patient safety, we must move toward examining the entire surgical process, including the vital role of SPDs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060327652&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060327652&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.12.010
DO - 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.12.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 30685129
AN - SCOPUS:85060327652
SN - 0196-6553
VL - 47
SP - 816
EP - 821
JO - American journal of infection control
JF - American journal of infection control
IS - 7
ER -