TY - JOUR
T1 - Through the looking glass
T2 - Viewing first-year composition through the lens of information literacy
AU - Chisholm, Alexandria
AU - Spencer, Brett
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded through the 2017-18 Berks Assessment Grant from the Penn State Berks Office of Planning, Research, and Assessment to evaluate student learning and improve student learning outcomes. Following the methodology of the FYC faculty’s previous assessment, this study utilized a rubric (see Appendix). Looking at students’ research papers with a rubric provides the ability to see what practices students actually follow in their real-world research. As Knight (2006) noted, student writing artifacts can serve as a “useful gauge of their achievement of information literacy based learning outcomes” (p. 43).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Communications in Information Literacy. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - This paper presents a case study of how librarians can situate themselves as pedagogical partners by bringing their unique information literacy perspective and expertise to the programmatic assessment process. This report resulted from the Thun Library and the Penn State Berks Composition Program's collaboration to assess the institution’s first-year composition (FYC) course. From previous programmatic assessments of their students’ work, the faculty knew that students struggled with source use in their rhetoric but found it difficult to pinpoint students’ exact source issues. By adapting a rubric theoretically-grounded in the ACRL Framework to deconstruct the concept of source use into four categories, librarians developed a rubric that illuminated source engagement problems on a more granular level than the programmatic assessments conducted without librarian involvement, leading to specific suggestions for addressing issues with student source engagement.
AB - This paper presents a case study of how librarians can situate themselves as pedagogical partners by bringing their unique information literacy perspective and expertise to the programmatic assessment process. This report resulted from the Thun Library and the Penn State Berks Composition Program's collaboration to assess the institution’s first-year composition (FYC) course. From previous programmatic assessments of their students’ work, the faculty knew that students struggled with source use in their rhetoric but found it difficult to pinpoint students’ exact source issues. By adapting a rubric theoretically-grounded in the ACRL Framework to deconstruct the concept of source use into four categories, librarians developed a rubric that illuminated source engagement problems on a more granular level than the programmatic assessments conducted without librarian involvement, leading to specific suggestions for addressing issues with student source engagement.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073424720&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073424720&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.15760/comminfolit.2019.13.1.4
DO - 10.15760/comminfolit.2019.13.1.4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85073424720
SN - 1933-5954
VL - 13
SP - 43
EP - 60
JO - Communications in Information Literacy
JF - Communications in Information Literacy
IS - 1
M1 - 4
ER -