TY - JOUR
T1 - Tissue-damaging marking methods do not affect tick burdens on field captured Peromyscus spp.
AU - Roberts, Chloe E.
AU - Burgess, Edwin R.
AU - Miller, Taylor M.
AU - Wise, Anna Marie
AU - Dickerson, Cera J.
AU - Skvarla, Michael J.
AU - Li, Andrew Y.
AU - Machtinger, Erika T.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank the members (JB, JE and KG) of the Veterinary Entomology Laboratory for their contributions during fieldwork conducted for this project and Dr. Ashley Dowling for his identification of the parasitic mite recovered. We thank the Pennsylvania Game Commission for use of the Pennsylvania State Game Lands for this research. This work was conducted through a non-assistance cooperative agreement (No. 58-8042-0-037) between Pennsylvania State University and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agricultural Research Service (ARS) with funding support to AYL from the Deployed War Fighter Protection Research Program (DWFP), the Armed Forces Pest Management Board (AFPMB), and the U.S. Department of Defense. We thank P. Neuhaus (Associate Editor), A. Knipps (Editorial Assistant), A. Tunstall (Copy Editor) and J. Levengood (Content Editor) and 2 anonymous reviewers for constructive comments that improved our manuscript.
Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank the members (JB, JE and KG) of the Veterinary Entomology Laboratory for their contributions during fieldwork conducted for this project and Dr. Ashley Dowling for his identification of the parasitic mite recovered. We thank the Pennsylvania Game Commission for use of the Pennsylvania State Game Lands for this research. This work was conducted through a non‐assistance cooperative agreement (No. 58‐8042‐0‐037) between Pennsylvania State University and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agricultural Research Service (ARS) with funding support to AYL from the Deployed War Fighter Protection Research Program (DWFP), the Armed Forces Pest Management Board (AFPMB), and the U.S. Department of Defense. We thank P. Neuhaus (Associate Editor), A. Knipps (Editorial Assistant), A. Tunstall (Copy Editor) and J. Levengood (Content Editor) and 2 anonymous reviewers for constructive comments that improved our manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Wildlife Society Bulletin published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Wildlife Society.
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - The blacklegged tick, Ixodes scapularis, is the vector of Borrelia burgdorferi, the etiological agent that causes Lyme disease in North America. Studies investigating host-parasite interactions are valuable in understanding I. scapularis ecology, and, by extension, the transmission of the Lyme disease pathogen. Small mammals are important hosts for I. scapularis, particularly white-footed mice and deer mice from the genus Peromyscus. Peromyscus spp. mice have been used as model organisms in several fields of research and are frequently trapped to evaluate broad ecological concepts. Previous studies have suggested that tissue-damaging marking methods were associated with increased tick burdens, which may have consequences in ecological studies. Our study was designed to evaluate 3 tissue-damaging marking methods including lab tags, round tags, and ear punches alongside a non-tissue damage control (blue dye) to determine if any method affected tick burdens on captured mice. Mice were captured biweekly using Sherman traps from May through September in 2020. The overall tick burden fluctuated between months, but no significant difference in total tick burden was found between captured male and female mice. There were no significant differences in tick burden on captured mice among the tissue damaging marking methods and the control. Therefore, marking method choice for Peromyscus spp. for tick ecology studies should consider personal preferences, cost, ease of use, and durability.
AB - The blacklegged tick, Ixodes scapularis, is the vector of Borrelia burgdorferi, the etiological agent that causes Lyme disease in North America. Studies investigating host-parasite interactions are valuable in understanding I. scapularis ecology, and, by extension, the transmission of the Lyme disease pathogen. Small mammals are important hosts for I. scapularis, particularly white-footed mice and deer mice from the genus Peromyscus. Peromyscus spp. mice have been used as model organisms in several fields of research and are frequently trapped to evaluate broad ecological concepts. Previous studies have suggested that tissue-damaging marking methods were associated with increased tick burdens, which may have consequences in ecological studies. Our study was designed to evaluate 3 tissue-damaging marking methods including lab tags, round tags, and ear punches alongside a non-tissue damage control (blue dye) to determine if any method affected tick burdens on captured mice. Mice were captured biweekly using Sherman traps from May through September in 2020. The overall tick burden fluctuated between months, but no significant difference in total tick burden was found between captured male and female mice. There were no significant differences in tick burden on captured mice among the tissue damaging marking methods and the control. Therefore, marking method choice for Peromyscus spp. for tick ecology studies should consider personal preferences, cost, ease of use, and durability.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142084355&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85142084355&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/wsb.1385
DO - 10.1002/wsb.1385
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85142084355
SN - 0091-7648
VL - 46
JO - Wildlife Society Bulletin
JF - Wildlife Society Bulletin
IS - 5
M1 - e1385
ER -