TY - JOUR
T1 - Top-down and bottom-up approaches to health care quality
T2 - The impacts of regulation and report cards
AU - Mukamel, Dana B.
AU - Haeder, Simon F.
AU - Weimer, David L.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - The high cost of the US health care system does not buy uniformly high quality of care. Concern about low quality has prompted two major types of public policy responses: regulation, a top-down approach, and report cards, a bottom-up approach. Each can result in either functional provider responses, which increase quality, or dysfunctional responses, which may lower quality. What do we know about the impacts of these two policy approaches to quality? To answer this question, we review the extant literature on regulation and report cards. We find evidence of both functional and dysfunctional effects. In addition, we identify the areas in which additional research would most likely be valuable.
AB - The high cost of the US health care system does not buy uniformly high quality of care. Concern about low quality has prompted two major types of public policy responses: regulation, a top-down approach, and report cards, a bottom-up approach. Each can result in either functional provider responses, which increase quality, or dysfunctional responses, which may lower quality. What do we know about the impacts of these two policy approaches to quality? To answer this question, we review the extant literature on regulation and report cards. We find evidence of both functional and dysfunctional effects. In addition, we identify the areas in which additional research would most likely be valuable.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897067747&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897067747&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-082313-115826
DO - 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-082313-115826
M3 - Article
C2 - 24159921
AN - SCOPUS:84897067747
SN - 0163-7525
VL - 35
SP - 477
EP - 497
JO - Annual Review of Public Health
JF - Annual Review of Public Health
ER -