TY - JOUR
T1 - Topical permethrin may increase blacklegged tick (Ixodes scapularis) repellency but is associated with cutaneous irritation in horses
AU - Poh, Karen C.
AU - Cole, Zoey T.
AU - Smarsh, Danielle N.
AU - Springer, Hayley R.
AU - Kelly, Kathleen
AU - Kenny, Laura B.
AU - Machtinger, Erika T.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors extend their gratitude to Baxter Bierbaum, Jessica Brown, Mia Esoldo, Jesse Evans, Kylie Green, Chloe Roberts, Hannah Tiffin, and Anna Marie Wise for their assistance during the experiments. This research would not have been possible without guidance from Drs. Jacob Werner, Edward Jedrzejewski, Sima Lionikaite, and Melissa Welker. This study was funded by the Pennsylvania State University College of Agricultural Sciences Science to Practice Grant, and the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture and Hatch Appropriations under Project PEN04608 and Accession number 1010032. The authors declare that there were no conflicts of interest.
Funding Information:
This study was funded by the Pennsylvania State University College of Agricultural Sciences Science to Practice Grant, and the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture and Hatch Appropriations under Project PEN04608 and Accession number 1010032.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, American Veterinary Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/4
Y1 - 2023/4
N2 - OBJECTIVE To evaluate the safety of repeated applications of permethrin concentrations (0% control, 1.5%, 5%, and 10%) to the necks and faces of horses and assess the efficacy and longevity of permethrin as an equine tick repellent. ANIMALS 5 healthy adult Quarter Horses. PROCEDURES Each treatment was applied to the neck of each horse (0.01 m2) 4 times a day, for up to 10 days. An 8-mm biopsy was taken to evaluate postexposure dermal responses. Any treatments that were not withdrawn were applied to a quadrant of the horse’s face 4 times a day, for up to 5 days. For tick bioassays, a treatment was applied to 1 leg of a horse and 5 female blacklegged ticks (Ixodes scapularis) were evaluated as “repelled” or “not repelled” by the treatment. The bioassays were repeated up to 5 days, but treatment application took place only on the first day of the experiment. RESULTS Histological results of neck biopsies indicated that more repeated exposures or higher concentrations resulted in more dermal damage. Tick bioassays showed that 5% and 10% permethrin had the greatest efficacy and longevity as a tick repellent, but the differences in tick repellency were not significant overall. CLINICAL RELEVANCE While there was a nonsignificant trend of higher permethrin concentrations repelling more ticks with longer-lasting residual repellent effects, higher concentrations also produced greater skin damage after repeated exposures. These opposing findings emphasize the need for better tick prevention and control methods that balance safety and efficacy for the equine community.
AB - OBJECTIVE To evaluate the safety of repeated applications of permethrin concentrations (0% control, 1.5%, 5%, and 10%) to the necks and faces of horses and assess the efficacy and longevity of permethrin as an equine tick repellent. ANIMALS 5 healthy adult Quarter Horses. PROCEDURES Each treatment was applied to the neck of each horse (0.01 m2) 4 times a day, for up to 10 days. An 8-mm biopsy was taken to evaluate postexposure dermal responses. Any treatments that were not withdrawn were applied to a quadrant of the horse’s face 4 times a day, for up to 5 days. For tick bioassays, a treatment was applied to 1 leg of a horse and 5 female blacklegged ticks (Ixodes scapularis) were evaluated as “repelled” or “not repelled” by the treatment. The bioassays were repeated up to 5 days, but treatment application took place only on the first day of the experiment. RESULTS Histological results of neck biopsies indicated that more repeated exposures or higher concentrations resulted in more dermal damage. Tick bioassays showed that 5% and 10% permethrin had the greatest efficacy and longevity as a tick repellent, but the differences in tick repellency were not significant overall. CLINICAL RELEVANCE While there was a nonsignificant trend of higher permethrin concentrations repelling more ticks with longer-lasting residual repellent effects, higher concentrations also produced greater skin damage after repeated exposures. These opposing findings emphasize the need for better tick prevention and control methods that balance safety and efficacy for the equine community.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85151574948&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85151574948&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2460/ajvr.22.10.0176
DO - 10.2460/ajvr.22.10.0176
M3 - Article
C2 - 36800301
AN - SCOPUS:85151574948
SN - 0002-9645
VL - 84
JO - American journal of veterinary research
JF - American journal of veterinary research
IS - 4
ER -