TY - JOUR
T1 - Toward a nasa-specific project management framework
AU - Shenhar, Aaron
AU - Dvir, Dov
AU - Milosevic, Dragan
AU - Mulenburg, Jerry
AU - Patanakul, Peerasit
AU - Reilly, Richard
AU - Ryan, Michael
AU - Sage, Andrew
AU - Sauser, Brian
AU - Srivannaboon, Sabin
AU - Stefanovic, Joca
AU - Thamhain, Hans
PY - 2005/12/1
Y1 - 2005/12/1
N2 - One of the most common myths in the discipline of project management is the assumption that all projects are the same and can be managed with the same set of processes and techniques. In reality, however, projects differ and “one size does not fit all.” Based on our previous research, we have learned that adapting the right approach to the right project is critical to project success; yet, very few organizations know how to distinguish among their project efforts. Furthermore, we have also learned that there is no universal framework that works effectively for all organizations. NASA's procedures suggest several distinctions among projects based on product lines and priority levels. These distinctions form a base for different approval processes. The next step will be to help managers actually manage different projects in different ways. The purpose of this research was to study several NASA programs and start identifying a framework that would work for project managers and teams in the NASA environment. We used four current projects as case studies to test the validity of potential frameworks, and have suggested an initial NASA-specific framework that could eventually lead to guidelines for tailoring project and program management to project type.
AB - One of the most common myths in the discipline of project management is the assumption that all projects are the same and can be managed with the same set of processes and techniques. In reality, however, projects differ and “one size does not fit all.” Based on our previous research, we have learned that adapting the right approach to the right project is critical to project success; yet, very few organizations know how to distinguish among their project efforts. Furthermore, we have also learned that there is no universal framework that works effectively for all organizations. NASA's procedures suggest several distinctions among projects based on product lines and priority levels. These distinctions form a base for different approval processes. The next step will be to help managers actually manage different projects in different ways. The purpose of this research was to study several NASA programs and start identifying a framework that would work for project managers and teams in the NASA environment. We used four current projects as case studies to test the validity of potential frameworks, and have suggested an initial NASA-specific framework that could eventually lead to guidelines for tailoring project and program management to project type.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=32644460835&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=32644460835&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10429247.2005.11431667
DO - 10.1080/10429247.2005.11431667
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:32644460835
SN - 1042-9247
VL - 17
SP - 8
EP - 16
JO - EMJ - Engineering Management Journal
JF - EMJ - Engineering Management Journal
IS - 4
ER -