TY - JOUR
T1 - Toward a Transformative GSL Ethics
T2 - How Global Service-Learning Faculty Reconcile Clashing Personal and Institutional Values Surrounding GSL
AU - Sexsmith, Kathleen
AU - Kiely, Richard
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by the University of Georgia. eISSN 2164-8212
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Global service-learning (GSL) course offerings have expanded rapidly in the last decade at U.S. universities and colleges, yet faculty are not always prepared for the ethical challenges of development work with disadvantaged communities in international settings. Based on a qualitative study of 25 GSL faculty across a range of higher education institutions in the United States, this article describes what drives faculty members to participate in GSL, analyzes the community engagement principles that guide their GSL work, and assesses how they cope with the dissonance that arises when striving to meet the sometimes-conflicting needs of students, communities, and educational institutions. We find that these faculty employ a “transformative GSL ethics” to realize their motivations and visions for a counter-normative approach to community engagement. We argue that higher education institutions must shift their norms, values, and practices with respect to professional development and pedagogy if they are to continue promoting the GSL agenda.
AB - Global service-learning (GSL) course offerings have expanded rapidly in the last decade at U.S. universities and colleges, yet faculty are not always prepared for the ethical challenges of development work with disadvantaged communities in international settings. Based on a qualitative study of 25 GSL faculty across a range of higher education institutions in the United States, this article describes what drives faculty members to participate in GSL, analyzes the community engagement principles that guide their GSL work, and assesses how they cope with the dissonance that arises when striving to meet the sometimes-conflicting needs of students, communities, and educational institutions. We find that these faculty employ a “transformative GSL ethics” to realize their motivations and visions for a counter-normative approach to community engagement. We argue that higher education institutions must shift their norms, values, and practices with respect to professional development and pedagogy if they are to continue promoting the GSL agenda.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177451990&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85177451990&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85177451990
SN - 1534-6102
VL - 27
SP - 5
EP - 30
JO - Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement
JF - Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement
IS - 3
ER -