Abstract
Suppose a transgender child experiences teasing and harassment from their classmates, whose hostile reactions interrupt the school day. School administrators tell the transgender child that, in order to allow educational activities to continue, they must dress in more gender-neutral clothing, ideally consistent with the sex they were assigned at birth. The student’s parents protest, arguing that their child’s clothing is speech that expresses their gender identity. The school points to Tinker v. Des Moines, allowing suppression of student speech where it creates a material disruption, as well as recent legislation characterizing discussion of gender identity as lewd and obscene.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 435-502 |
| Number of pages | 68 |
| Journal | Boston University Law Review |
| Volume | 104 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| State | Published - 2024 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'TRANSGENDER STUDENTS AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver