TY - JOUR
T1 - Traumatic brain injury and the frontal lobes
T2 - What can we gain with diffusion tensor imaging?
AU - Zappalà, Giuseppe
AU - Thiebaut de Schotten, Michel
AU - Eslinger, Paul J.
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank the NATBRAINLAB ( http://www . natbrainlab.com ) for helpful discussion. This work was supported by the Agence Nationale de Recherche (ANR) [project CAFORPFC, number ANR-09-RPDOC-004-01 and project HM-TC, number ANR-09-EMER-006] and by a Dean’s Feasibility grant from the Penn State College of Medicine. Many thanks to Mimmo Tomaselli, MD who helped during elaboration and post-processing of MRI images and Lauren Sakuma who edited the paper for English.
PY - 2012/2
Y1 - 2012/2
N2 - Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death in the young population and long-term disability in relation to pervasive cognitive-behavioural disturbances that follow frontal lobe damage. To date, emphasis has been placed primarily on the clinical correlates of frontal cortex damage, whilst identification of the contribution of subjacent white matter lesion is less clear. Our poor understanding of white matter pathology in TBI is primarily due to the low sensitivity of conventional neuroimaging to identify pathological changes in less severe traumatic injury and the lack of methods to localise white matter pathology onto individual frontal lobe connections. In this paper we focus on the potential contribution of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to TBI. Our review of the current literature supports the conclusion that DTI is particularly sensitive to changes in the microstructure of frontal white matter, thus providing a valuable biomarker of the severity of traumatic injury and prognostic indicator of recovery of function. Furthermore we propose an atlas approach to TBI to map white matter lesions onto individual tracts. In the cases presented here we showed a direct correspondence between the clinical manifestations of the patients and the damage to specific white matter tracts. We are confident that in the near future the application of DTI to TBI will improve our understanding of the complex and heterogeneous clinical symptomatology which follows a TBI, especially mild and moderate head injury, which still represents 70-80% of all clinical population.
AB - Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death in the young population and long-term disability in relation to pervasive cognitive-behavioural disturbances that follow frontal lobe damage. To date, emphasis has been placed primarily on the clinical correlates of frontal cortex damage, whilst identification of the contribution of subjacent white matter lesion is less clear. Our poor understanding of white matter pathology in TBI is primarily due to the low sensitivity of conventional neuroimaging to identify pathological changes in less severe traumatic injury and the lack of methods to localise white matter pathology onto individual frontal lobe connections. In this paper we focus on the potential contribution of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to TBI. Our review of the current literature supports the conclusion that DTI is particularly sensitive to changes in the microstructure of frontal white matter, thus providing a valuable biomarker of the severity of traumatic injury and prognostic indicator of recovery of function. Furthermore we propose an atlas approach to TBI to map white matter lesions onto individual tracts. In the cases presented here we showed a direct correspondence between the clinical manifestations of the patients and the damage to specific white matter tracts. We are confident that in the near future the application of DTI to TBI will improve our understanding of the complex and heterogeneous clinical symptomatology which follows a TBI, especially mild and moderate head injury, which still represents 70-80% of all clinical population.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856222583&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856222583&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.06.020
DO - 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.06.020
M3 - Review article
C2 - 21813118
AN - SCOPUS:84856222583
SN - 0010-9452
VL - 48
SP - 156
EP - 165
JO - Cortex
JF - Cortex
IS - 2
ER -