TY - JOUR
T1 - Trends in the use of computerized physician order entry by health-system affiliated ambulatory clinics in the United States, 2014-2016
AU - Fischer, Shira H.
AU - Rudin, Robert S.
AU - Shi, Yunfeng
AU - Shekelle, Paul
AU - Amill-Rosario, Alejandro
AU - Scanlon, Dennis
AU - Damberg, Cheryl L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s).
PY - 2020/9/7
Y1 - 2020/9/7
N2 - Background: Computerized provider order entry (CPOE) can help providers deliver better quality care. We aimed to understand recent trends in use of CPOE by health system-affiliated ambulatory clinics. Methods: We analyzed longitudinal data (2014-2016) for 19,109 ambulatory clinics that participated in all 3 years of the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society Analytics survey to assess use of CPOE and identify characteristics of clinics associated with CPOE use. We calculated descriptive statistics to examine overall trends in use, location of order entry (bedside vs. clinical station), and system-level use CPOE across all clinics. We used linear probability models to explore the association between clinic characteristics (practice size, practice type, and health system type) and two outcomes of interest: CPOE use at any point between 2014 and 2016, and CPOE use beginning in 2015 or 2016. Results: Between 2014 and 2016, use of CPOE increased more than 9 percentage points from 58 to 67%. Larger clinics and those affiliated with multi-hospital health systems were more likely to have reported use of CPOE. We found no difference in CPOE use by primary care versus specialty care clinics. When used, most clinics reported using CPOE for most or all of their orders. Health systems that used CPOE usually did so for all system-affiliated clinics. Conclusions: Small practice size or not being part of a multi-hospital system are associated with lower use of CPOE between 2014 and 2016. Less than optimal use in these environments may be harming patient outcomes.
AB - Background: Computerized provider order entry (CPOE) can help providers deliver better quality care. We aimed to understand recent trends in use of CPOE by health system-affiliated ambulatory clinics. Methods: We analyzed longitudinal data (2014-2016) for 19,109 ambulatory clinics that participated in all 3 years of the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society Analytics survey to assess use of CPOE and identify characteristics of clinics associated with CPOE use. We calculated descriptive statistics to examine overall trends in use, location of order entry (bedside vs. clinical station), and system-level use CPOE across all clinics. We used linear probability models to explore the association between clinic characteristics (practice size, practice type, and health system type) and two outcomes of interest: CPOE use at any point between 2014 and 2016, and CPOE use beginning in 2015 or 2016. Results: Between 2014 and 2016, use of CPOE increased more than 9 percentage points from 58 to 67%. Larger clinics and those affiliated with multi-hospital health systems were more likely to have reported use of CPOE. We found no difference in CPOE use by primary care versus specialty care clinics. When used, most clinics reported using CPOE for most or all of their orders. Health systems that used CPOE usually did so for all system-affiliated clinics. Conclusions: Small practice size or not being part of a multi-hospital system are associated with lower use of CPOE between 2014 and 2016. Less than optimal use in these environments may be harming patient outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090508377&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85090508377&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12913-020-05679-4
DO - 10.1186/s12913-020-05679-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 32894110
AN - SCOPUS:85090508377
SN - 1472-6963
VL - 20
JO - BMC health services research
JF - BMC health services research
IS - 1
M1 - 836
ER -