TY - JOUR
T1 - TCHANGE
T2 - The role of values and visioning in transformation science
AU - Tschakert, Petra
AU - Tuana, Nancy
AU - Westskog, Hege
AU - Koelle, Bettina
AU - Afrika, Alida
N1 - Funding Information:
This material is based upon work supported by the ISSC under the Transformations to Sustainability Programme. The Programme is funded by the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida) and serves as a contribution to Future Earth. Additional support for seed funding is provided by the Swedish Secretariat for Environmental Earth System Sciences (SSEESS). We thank Peter Buckland, Klaus Keller, Doug Besette, Bill Sharp, Ioan Fazey, Peterson Toscano, Simon Dennis, Fred Brown, Partha Das, Heather Sinclair, Mario Machado, and Karen Paiva Henrique for stimulating and insightful contributions to the workshop debates.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier B.V..
Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/6/1
Y1 - 2016/6/1
N2 - There is growing recognition of the role of values and visioning for transdisciplinary co-production of knowledge and social transformation. Mapping and deliberating values and envisioning desirable futures are seen as important aspects of transformational learning. TCHANGE (Addressing the Climate Crisis through Value Transformation) aimed to examine how values and anticipating future pathways could be assessed in collaboration with transformational communities. Initially, researchers and practitioners from five countries had divergent views about methodological standards, reflecting distinct ontologies and asymmetrical power relations within the team. However, the emerging tension between scientific rigor, societal relevance, and experiential learning proved productive for flexibility in the problem framing and team building phase of the transdisciplinary co-design process.
AB - There is growing recognition of the role of values and visioning for transdisciplinary co-production of knowledge and social transformation. Mapping and deliberating values and envisioning desirable futures are seen as important aspects of transformational learning. TCHANGE (Addressing the Climate Crisis through Value Transformation) aimed to examine how values and anticipating future pathways could be assessed in collaboration with transformational communities. Initially, researchers and practitioners from five countries had divergent views about methodological standards, reflecting distinct ontologies and asymmetrical power relations within the team. However, the emerging tension between scientific rigor, societal relevance, and experiential learning proved productive for flexibility in the problem framing and team building phase of the transdisciplinary co-design process.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969820455&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84969820455&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.04.003
DO - 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.04.003
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84969820455
SN - 1877-3435
VL - 20
SP - 21
EP - 25
JO - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
JF - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
ER -