TY - JOUR
T1 - Turning Chutes into Ladders for Women Faculty
T2 - A Review and Roadmap for Equity in Academia
AU - Cardel, Michelle I.
AU - Dhurandhar, Emily
AU - Yarar-Fisher, Ceren
AU - Foster, Monica
AU - Hidalgo, Bertha
AU - McClure, Leslie A.
AU - Pagoto, Sherry
AU - Brown, Nathanial
AU - Pekmezi, Dori
AU - Sharafeldin, Noha
AU - Willig, Amanda L.
AU - Angelini, Christine
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright 2020, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
PY - 2020/5/1
Y1 - 2020/5/1
N2 - Despite significant progress in recent decades, the recruitment, advancement, and promotion of women in academia remain low. Women represent a large portion of the talent pool in academia, and receive >50% of all PhDs, but this has not yet translated into sustained representation in faculty and leadership positions. Research indicates that women encounter numerous "chutes"that remove them from academia or provide setbacks to promotion at all stages of their careers. These include the perception that women are less competent and their outputs of lesser quality, implicit bias in teaching evaluations and grant funding decisions, and lower citation rates. This review aims to (1) synthesize the "chutes"that impede the careers of women faculty, and (2) provide feasible recommendations, or "ladders"for addressing these issues at all career levels. Enacting policies that function as "ladders"rather than "chutes"for academic women is essential to even the playing field, achieve gender equity, and foster economic, societal, and cultural benefits of academia.
AB - Despite significant progress in recent decades, the recruitment, advancement, and promotion of women in academia remain low. Women represent a large portion of the talent pool in academia, and receive >50% of all PhDs, but this has not yet translated into sustained representation in faculty and leadership positions. Research indicates that women encounter numerous "chutes"that remove them from academia or provide setbacks to promotion at all stages of their careers. These include the perception that women are less competent and their outputs of lesser quality, implicit bias in teaching evaluations and grant funding decisions, and lower citation rates. This review aims to (1) synthesize the "chutes"that impede the careers of women faculty, and (2) provide feasible recommendations, or "ladders"for addressing these issues at all career levels. Enacting policies that function as "ladders"rather than "chutes"for academic women is essential to even the playing field, achieve gender equity, and foster economic, societal, and cultural benefits of academia.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084784383&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85084784383&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/jwh.2019.8027
DO - 10.1089/jwh.2019.8027
M3 - Article
C2 - 32043918
AN - SCOPUS:85084784383
SN - 1540-9996
VL - 29
SP - 721
EP - 733
JO - Journal of Women's Health
JF - Journal of Women's Health
IS - 5
ER -