Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Twenty-first century bioarchaeology: Taking stock and moving forward

  • Jane E. Buikstra
  • , Sharon N. DeWitte
  • , Sabrina C. Agarwal
  • , Brenda J. Baker
  • , Eric J. Bartelink
  • , Elizabeth Berger
  • , Kelly E. Blevins
  • , Katelyn Bolhofner
  • , Alexis T. Boutin
  • , Megan B. Brickley
  • , Michele R. Buzon
  • , Carlina de la Cova
  • , Lynne Goldstein
  • , Rebecca Gowland
  • , Anne L. Grauer
  • , Lesley A. Gregoricka
  • , Siân E. Halcrow
  • , Sarah A. Hall
  • , Simon Hillson
  • , Ann M. Kakaliouras
  • Haagen D. Klaus, Kelly J. Knudson, Christopher J. Knüsel, Clark Spencer Larsen, Debra L. Martin, George R. Milner, Mario Novak, Kenneth C. Nystrom, Sofía I. Pacheco-Forés, Tracy L. Prowse, Gwen Robbins Schug, Charlotte A. Roberts, Jessica E. Rothwell, Ana Luisa Santos, Christopher Stojanowski, Anne C. Stone, Kyra E. Stull, Daniel H. Temple, Christina M. Torres, J. Marla Toyne, Tiffiny A. Tung, Jaime Ullinger, Karin Wiltschke-Schrotta, Sonia R. Zakrzewski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

68   Link opens in a new tab Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

This article presents outcomes from a Workshop entitled “Bioarchaeology: Taking Stock and Moving Forward,” which was held at Arizona State University (ASU) on March 6–8, 2020. Funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), the School of Human Evolution and Social Change (ASU), and the Center for Bioarchaeological Research (CBR, ASU), the Workshop's overall goal was to explore reasons why research proposals submitted by bioarchaeologists, both graduate students and established scholars, fared disproportionately poorly within recent NSF Anthropology Program competitions and to offer advice for increasing success. Therefore, this Workshop comprised 43 international scholars and four advanced graduate students with a history of successful grant acquisition, primarily from the United States. Ultimately, we focused on two related aims: (1) best practices for improving research designs and training and (2) evaluating topics of contemporary significance that reverberate through history and beyond as promising trajectories for bioarchaeological research. Among the former were contextual grounding, research question/hypothesis generation, statistical procedures appropriate for small samples and mixed qualitative/quantitative data, the salience of Bayesian methods, and training program content. Topical foci included ethics, social inequality, identity (including intersectionality), climate change, migration, violence, epidemic disease, adaptability/plasticity, the osteological paradox, and the developmental origins of health and disease. Given the profound changes required globally to address decolonization in the 21st century, this concern also entered many formal and informal discussions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)54-114
Number of pages61
JournalAmerican Journal of Biological Anthropology
Volume178
Issue numberS74
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anatomy
  • Anthropology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Twenty-first century bioarchaeology: Taking stock and moving forward'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this