TY - JOUR
T1 - Understanding Fear of Zika
T2 - Personal, Interpersonal, and Media Influences
AU - Yang, Chun
AU - Dillard, James Price
AU - Li, Ruobing
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by a Faculty Research Grant from the Department of Communication Arts & Sciences, Pennsylvania State University.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Society for Risk Analysis
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/12
Y1 - 2018/12
N2 - Fear of infectious disease often motivates people to protect themselves. But, it can also produce negative bio-social-psychological effects whose severity is on par with those of the disease. The WHO declaration of Zika as a world health crisis presented an opportunity to study factors that bring about fear. Beginning nine days after the WHO announcement, data were gathered from women aged 18–35 living in the southern United States (N = 719). Respondents reported experiencing fear of Zika at levels akin to those reported following other significant crises/disasters (e.g., the terrorist attacks of 9/11). Fear increased as a function of (1) personal, but not other-relevance, (2) frequency of media exposure, but not media content, and (3) frequency of interpersonal exposure and interpersonal content. It is argued that media and interpersonal message sources may be innately predisposed to amplify, rather than attenuate, risk.
AB - Fear of infectious disease often motivates people to protect themselves. But, it can also produce negative bio-social-psychological effects whose severity is on par with those of the disease. The WHO declaration of Zika as a world health crisis presented an opportunity to study factors that bring about fear. Beginning nine days after the WHO announcement, data were gathered from women aged 18–35 living in the southern United States (N = 719). Respondents reported experiencing fear of Zika at levels akin to those reported following other significant crises/disasters (e.g., the terrorist attacks of 9/11). Fear increased as a function of (1) personal, but not other-relevance, (2) frequency of media exposure, but not media content, and (3) frequency of interpersonal exposure and interpersonal content. It is argued that media and interpersonal message sources may be innately predisposed to amplify, rather than attenuate, risk.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049651504&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049651504&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/risa.12973
DO - 10.1111/risa.12973
M3 - Article
C2 - 29392760
AN - SCOPUS:85049651504
SN - 0272-4332
VL - 38
SP - 2535
EP - 2545
JO - Risk Analysis
JF - Risk Analysis
IS - 12
ER -