Understanding genetic variation in in vivo tolerance to artesunate: Implications for treatment efficacy and resistance monitoring

Laura C. Pollitt, Derek Sim, Rahel Salathé, Andrew F. Read

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Artemisinin-based drugs are the front-line weapon in the treatment of human malaria cases, but there is concern that recent reports of slow clearing infections may signal developing resistance to treatment. In the absence of molecular markers for resistance, current efforts to monitor drug efficacy are based on the rate at which parasites are cleared from infections. However, some knowledge of the standing variation in parasite susceptibility is needed to identify a meaningful increase in infection half-life. Here, we show that five previously unexposed genotypes of the rodent malaria parasite Plasmodium chabaudi differ substantially in their in vivo response to treatment. Slower clearance rates were not linked to parasite virulence or growth rate, going against the suggestion that drug treatment will drive the evolution of virulence in this system. The level of variation observed here in a relatively small number of genotypes suggests existing 'resistant' parasites could be present in the population and therefore, increased parasite clearance rates could represent selection on pre-existing variation rather than de novo resistance events. This has implications for resistance monitoring as susceptibility may depend on evolved traits unrelated to drug exposure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)296-304
Number of pages9
JournalEvolutionary Applications
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2015

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Genetics
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding genetic variation in in vivo tolerance to artesunate: Implications for treatment efficacy and resistance monitoring'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this