TY - JOUR
T1 - Uniquely representing "a preference for uniformity"
AU - Chatterjee, Kalyan
AU - Krishna, R. Vijay
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - In a model of decision making over sets of alternatives, we consider an agent who conceives of the different utilities she will receive (depending on the state of mind she is in, her subjective state) when she finally makes a choice from the set. Her uncertainty is described by multiple beliefs (or measures) over the state space. She is pessimistic about the true beliefs, and would like to hedge her bets. This results in her having a preference for uniformity of payoffs across the various subjective states. We present a utility representation for such agents and show that our representation provides a natural measure of the agent's desire for uniformity of payoffs in the subjective states. We also show that concerns for uniformity are orthogonal to concerns about flexibility or commitment. We achieve this by relaxing the Independence axiom as applied to our environment. However, this weakening of Independence means that in settings with temptation, we can no longer ensure the existence of a unique normative ranking. Copyright.
AB - In a model of decision making over sets of alternatives, we consider an agent who conceives of the different utilities she will receive (depending on the state of mind she is in, her subjective state) when she finally makes a choice from the set. Her uncertainty is described by multiple beliefs (or measures) over the state space. She is pessimistic about the true beliefs, and would like to hedge her bets. This results in her having a preference for uniformity of payoffs across the various subjective states. We present a utility representation for such agents and show that our representation provides a natural measure of the agent's desire for uniformity of payoffs in the subjective states. We also show that concerns for uniformity are orthogonal to concerns about flexibility or commitment. We achieve this by relaxing the Independence axiom as applied to our environment. However, this weakening of Independence means that in settings with temptation, we can no longer ensure the existence of a unique normative ranking. Copyright.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857709407&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857709407&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2202/1935-1704.1807
DO - 10.2202/1935-1704.1807
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84857709407
SN - 1935-1704
VL - 12
JO - B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics
JF - B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics
IS - 1
M1 - 1
ER -