TY - GEN
T1 - Unpacking collaborative sense-making
T2 - 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences: The Interdisciplinarity of the Learning Sciences, ICLS 2020
AU - Aldemir, Tugce
AU - Borge, Marcela
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© ISLS.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - In this paper, we build upon a series of studies that aimed to explore the dynamics between socio-metacognition (knowledge about and ability to regulate team cognition) and the ability of teams to improve the quality of collaborative discussions. In these studies, discussion teams in an online course are provided with open-ended discussion questions about course content to discuss. Then, individuals score the quality of the team’s collaborative processes on six items, followed by entire team reviewing their scores and devising a plan for improvement. In this paper, we examine the relationship between team reflective accuracy, collaborative sense-making, and collaborative process quality for 12 teams over five time points. Findings show a significant correlation between the reflective accuracy and collaborative process quality. A further comparative case analysis shows the underlying patterns of collaborative sensemaking and reflective accuracy that impact team process quality.
AB - In this paper, we build upon a series of studies that aimed to explore the dynamics between socio-metacognition (knowledge about and ability to regulate team cognition) and the ability of teams to improve the quality of collaborative discussions. In these studies, discussion teams in an online course are provided with open-ended discussion questions about course content to discuss. Then, individuals score the quality of the team’s collaborative processes on six items, followed by entire team reviewing their scores and devising a plan for improvement. In this paper, we examine the relationship between team reflective accuracy, collaborative sense-making, and collaborative process quality for 12 teams over five time points. Findings show a significant correlation between the reflective accuracy and collaborative process quality. A further comparative case analysis shows the underlying patterns of collaborative sensemaking and reflective accuracy that impact team process quality.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102933793&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102933793&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85102933793
T3 - Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL
SP - 1709
EP - 1712
BT - 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences
A2 - Gresalfi, Melissa
A2 - Horn, Ilana Seidel
PB - International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS)
Y2 - 19 June 2020 through 23 June 2020
ER -