Use of Topical and Systemic Retinoids in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Update and Review of the Current Literature

Mitchell Herold, Allison J. Good, Colton B. Nielson, Maria I. Longo

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are at an increased risk of epithelial malignancies, mainly squamous cell carcinoma, and its precursor lesions such as actinic keratoses, warts, and porokeratosis, which may respond to retinoid therapy.OBJECTIVETo review the published evidence on the efficacy and safety of topical and systemic retinoids for the treatment and prophylaxis of malignant and premalignant conditions that mostly afflict SOTRs.MATERIALS AND METHODSSystematic review of the literature to summarize the level of evidence and grade of recommendation for retinoid therapy with emphasis in the SOTR population.RESULTSAcitretin has the highest strength of recommendation (Grade A) for prophylaxis of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and treatment and prophylaxis of actinic keratoses in SOTR. In nonimmunosuppressed patients, acitretin and isotretinoin have a Grade B recommendation for treatment of recalcitrant warts. Topical retinoids have not shown efficacy in preventing NMSC in immunocompetent patients.CONCLUSIONRetinoids constitute a highly efficacious alternative for the management of the most common conditions that affect SOTRs. Acitretin has the most robust evidence for chemoprophylaxis in SOTRs. Knowledge about the specific indications and expected side effects of topical and systemic retinoids may help optimize their therapeutic potential.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1442-1449
Number of pages8
JournalDermatologic Surgery
Volume45
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2019

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Dermatology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Use of Topical and Systemic Retinoids in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Update and Review of the Current Literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this